4 Comments

Hi Andrew,

I agree that we need to understand how Chat-GPT works. It's not by logic. Unless they have fixed it, it can't do math. So why use it as an authentication?

I am not suggesting that you use clickbait. It's just that your argument seemed very repetitive to me.

Expand full comment
author

indeed it is. Yes, they fixed it to do math. it is well beyond that at this point. While it may seem tot he casual observer that the conversation is 'repetitive', there's actually quite a lot of refinement going on. Perhaps this one is more concise.

https://andrewcorner.substack.com/p/the-great-deception-is-already-here-dbe?r=b7juy

Expand full comment

You may not get much response, not because of the content, but because of the length. CHAT GPT is not a reliable tool. You can twist it into something bizarre with training.

I agree, the enemy is active now and has been for millennia. It is a good message and needs to be heard. If you had just stuck to the first section, it would have made more impact.

Expand full comment
author

and there's our real problem. People need to understand how it all goes together. We don't need less information, we need more. We need more thoughtful people who want to understand, so we stop falling for all the quick fix nonsense, so with all due respect, I'll leave it to other people to produce click bait, I'm trying to produce threads for a tapestry.

I also think you underestimate what ChatGPT is and how it functions, and how all of these LLM's and their offspring function, and what the intention is for these 'agents'. It's more than some parlour trick. Without understanding what's motivating the useful idiots, we can't mount a proper defence, so we can choose to let it happen, or choose to pick up our brains off the floor, dust them off, and learn to use them again. Just my Humble two cents. But I think it's accurate.

Expand full comment