When the Fact Check Ignores the Framework
The Deeper Failure Behind Vaccine Orthodoxy
(Note: this is just a reproduction of the original X article I posted March 24th, you can find a link to that article here. In fact I appear to be largely throttled on that site so if you like the article and could retweet I would be grateful.)
Introduction
The Associated Press recently published a “fact check”
linking the decline of polio to vaccines
and rejecting any connection to pesticide exposure—specifically DDT. Their conclusion is clear: Polio was caused by a virus, vaccines eradicated it, and any suggestion otherwise is misinformation.
That’s the official story. But let’s unpack what they didn’t tell you. Not because the “virus exists” claim is in question, but because the history, incentives, and context behind the medical system are—and they’ve been ignored for far too long.
What the AP Gets “Right”… But Dangerously So
Yes, polio is a virus. Yes, vaccines correlate with a decline in reported polio cases. And yes, DDT is toxic.
But these statements are used as endpoints, not beginnings. They’re framed as conclusive rather than interrogative, and the result is a narrative that protects a fragile, self-serving system rather than seeking truth.
What They Omit: The System That Demands Belief
The Vaccine Industry Was Granted Legal Immunity in 1986 The National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act removed liability for vaccine manufacturers. This created a product pipeline where safety concerns became secondary, and public health became a sales force, not a watchdog.
The Polio Narrative Was the Industry’s PR Genesis The “end of polio” became the origin myth for the modern vaccine era. But even contemporaneous records from the mid-20th century (CDC & NIH data) show massive reclassification of polio cases, shifting diagnoses to make the vaccine appear more effective than it was. DDT exposure created neurological syndromes indistinguishable from polio, as documented in archived environmental health reports. This isn’t "the cause"—but it certainly complicates the tidy picture.
The Public Health Apparatus Was Born of Industrial, Not Humanitarian, Interests As documented in Rockefeller Medicine Men (written by a Marxist historian with access to original documents), the modern medical system was shaped by oil and banking interests seeking to manage labor, not promote wellness. It was designed to eliminate competition (homeopathy, naturopathy) and centralize power around allopathic, pharmaceutical models.
The Ideological Capture They Refuse to See
The AP article, like most modern “fact checks,” assumes that the public health system operates independently of ideology, economic interest, or political entanglement. This is naïve at best, and dangerously dishonest at worst.
Bill Gates now occupies the same seat Rockefeller once did—controlling WHO policy, funding global health “solutions,” and profiting massively from the outcomes.
The GAVI Alliance, co-founded by Gates, openly states that 14 of the 17 UN Sustainable Development Goals hinge on vaccination compliance. That is not health. That is global governance through medicine.
The Experts Have No Choice
Imagine being a pediatrician or a virologist whose entire career is built on the vaccine paradigm. Imagine realizing that some of what you’ve promoted may have caused harm. The cognitive dissonance would be unbearable.
And so:
Doubt is banished.
Contradictions are memory-holed.
Critics are labeled “deniers,” “conspiracists,” or “anti-science.”
But what if the real denial is happening inside the house?
The Deeper Danger: Obedience Disguised as Truth
You cited the science. I’m citing the structure.
The same structure that tells people dissent is dangerous.
That erases historical nuance.
That treats centralized control as “progress.”
The AP doesn’t need to know any of this, because their job isn’t to investigate. It’s to reinforce. Their allegiance is to the narrative, not to the messy, uncomfortable, and very human complexity of history.
So, Who’s More Grounded in Reality?
Is it the career journalist at the AP recycling NIH talking points and quoting a handful of institutionally captured academics?
Or is it someone like me—who has spent hundreds of hours reading:
Primary sources
Regulatory history
Critical books like The Real Anthony Fauci, SV-40: The Virus and the Vaccine, The Psychology of Totalitarianism, and Dissolving Illusions
And understanding the philosophical, economic, and psychological architecture of this entire system?
You decide.
But know this: You can only find real answers by asking real questions. And the first one should be:
Why are we so afraid of asking where the narrative came from in the first place?
Note: I followed up this short article with a tweet thread on how the people that work for this field are actually victims to their own industry, and programming.
You can click the below screen shot to get there, or if you don’t have X and make a request I could reformat the thread.
It’s also worth noting that I pay for the X account and it’s supposed to boost my visibility, but you can see by engagements how little visibility I’m getting.
