Every day a new Zealot decloaks, and tells you exactly what they’re thinking, because they don’t see themselves as zealots, but as crusaders for “the science”, by which they mean all the precepts that are contained within their Ideological disposition, and in fact, they see themselves as fighting for “Justice”, which is, shockingly I know, what their Ideological presuppositions tell them it is.
This is not normal behaviour.
They will tell themselves it is, but it is not.
Just listen to the framing in the above clip:
“..we already have a government that does not care about disability.. that does not do anything, to support people who have long term, chronic illnesses..
..and…we have… a situation in which we’re not providing the metrics…
…we’re… withholding data… we’re no longer ALLOWING.. um.. ah… teachers to REPORT cases in classrooms.. we’re no longer ALLOWING.. Family doctors to be doing PCR testing… Um.. ah.. we’re no longer… collecting ANY of the information that would actually provide the public… with the… required knowledge.. to make.. informed decisions…”
“..ok, let me just ask the obvious…ok hang on..”
“..no!”
Please don’t INTERRUPT me!… llllet me just finish… llllet me just finish… this is really important message.. “covid” is not OVER…”
So what do you hear? Do you hear a person that is concerned with the ability of every day Canadians to go about their Lives, without impediments or constant monitoring, testing, tracing, or various other interventions, because we should care about the “individual” right to do so?
Or do you hear what she’s actually saying, which is that it is a “far right”, “freedom” oriented desire to stop her and her “science” from becoming omnipotent/omnipresent within society, as demanded, as a sacrifice at the alter of “the science”?
Are we still actually talking about “science” the method? Or are we talking about something else…?
Is “science” a “method”?
Or a “prescription”?
Let’s take another listen in, this time to her opening comments where she set the stage for her justified outburst in the first place:
Forgive me for stating what should appear as obvious, but there is quite clearly a mental disorder that seems to be spurring these types into this kind of “reasoning” and behaviour. Even her colleague has presented himself, in studio, without resorting to the fears associated with constant masking, which I personally see as a manifestation of a kind of PTSD (post traumatic stress disorder), for the real and true zealots of “the science”, the one that is rooted in presuppositions about reality that I tried to touch base on in my first article here:
And here is her colleague, expressing almost the exact same points, but without all the, let’s be gracious, passion:
You may note some of the same ideas, and same concerns, even a lot of the same language used by our mask zealot, are also used by Maxwell Smith, who is introduced as a “Bio ethicist”, and it should strike us as curious, that even in times like the last two years, scratch that, especically in times like the last two years, a time unlike any time before it for the servants who work for us in the “public health” arena, should be concerned with what is good for the “public’s” health.
And what is the “public”, if not the combined will of the individuals who prop it up, by paying taxes and expecting, that means the people who work for us do their job, while keeping us in mind, and our health, including our mental health, which rarely seems to have entered the conversation when it came to how things needed to be handled over the last two and a half years.
As a “bio ethicist”, does it not seem odd he seems almost wholly unconcerned with the plight of every day Canadians, and how these last two and a half years, supported by the “reasoning” of “public health”, have been affected, and is instead, much more concerned with carefully worded messaging that seems a little too obsessed with weaving carefully crafted statements that, after it’s all said and done, presumably, judging by the comments and concerns of our “betters” in government and public service in recent times, once we’ve “built back better” by deploying “equity” based “reasoning”, and that we should instead take the concerns of those who these two assume, previous to “covid”, were not getting all the supports they needed?
Even if it is at the expense of individual concerns, jobs, Lives, and rights?
It might not surprise you to find out that Mr. Maxwell Smith had and has some of his training (and perhaps has his loyalties) with the “Dalla Lana School of public health”, one of the main hubs that is collaborating with the WHO and the UN to implement “agenda 2030”? To be perfectly honest, it just surprised me when I looked it up!
And WHO, are they, and what do they want…? Well I’m glad you asked.
They are the specialized department within the University of Toronto who is currently engaged with a major focus on social justice issues, including how to orient Canada, and Canadians, towards fulfilling the “SDG’s”, which are the blueprint Utopian wish list that is supposed to be in place by 2030.
Don’t believe me? Go take a look for yourself.
So many of the talking heads that have been leading the charge on many of the dogmatic approaches to handling our governments response to the “pandemic”, have come out of a handful of the players who trained in this department, including the infamous David Fissman, which is now seen to be one of the, now clearly disingenuous, actors who are still trying to spread fear far and wide, to scare people into compliance, and I looked him up months ago when I first realized what these people were up to.
But back to the comments from this finely trained Ideologue.
Mr. Paiken puts forth the question : “… What do you think the Ford governments approach to covid-19 nowadays tells us about their value judgements…”.
Putting aside that this is an odd way to pose a question, given that government is, first and foremost, a business, that is given the power, and the awesome responsibility, to enact and enable the public will to keep our societies functional, and pursue a path forward to do things for us that we might otherwise do for ourselves, if we had the time and the access to whatever project or public need they happen to be addressing.
At this point it’s worth noting that the “social contract”, is more or less what they should be tasked with doing. It is the unwritten law that came out of the Enlightenment tradition that states a government works towards enacting the will of the people that it represents. This is the entire reason we have elections, so that if they are not listening to the people, they will be replaced with people who will, and incidentally, this is the base level way that we can fight corruption from taking over governments, who may be drunk with the power that they wield, thinking that it is the citizens who serve the government, instead of the government that is obligated to serve the will of the people.
How did it become this way, and how did it work, specifically in a formerly “free” society?
Fundamentally, if we, the public, are “decent” citizens who pay taxes for services, and the government that is in power does its best to spend that money on our behalf and do so smartly, and hopefully in a way that maintains the rights of the citizens under their governance. I’d like to put forward that it would also be nice if, from time to time, they did so in such a way that largesse was kept in check, meaning that they should economically use the money they extract from the governed to administrate the needs of the citizens who have paid those taxes forward, and since they all seem to have this habit these days of telling us that we should be prepared to “tighten our belts” a little, and perhaps suffer some losses of foods we eat or goods that we can no longer afford due to soaring energy bills.
But we just had to do it “they” say, because of “climate change”, the ostensible underlying reasoning for agenda 2030 in the first place, and the “pandemic”, that we now know is little more dangerous than a flu season, but thanks to Ideologues the Dalla Lana school and their “partners” for the reset agenda at the UN/WHO/WEF nexus, the propaganda efforts that came out of “public health”, were sufficient to scare regular people that have no idea that the driving force behind all of this wild hyperbole is the reset agenda.
This giant new plan for Humanity that brings together all the Ideologies into one giant neo communistic burrito filled with the synthetic new food stuffs that is meant to replace our current diets with more “climate” friendly alternatives, that the WEF “partner” side of the equation has been busily building in the background, and lastly due to the the war in Ukraine, that for me, came on the heels of a massive push back against all of these efforts, so it’s more than just a little “suss”, as the kids say.
So now, we understand a little more of the context, and the Player.
The answer from the “bio ethicist” to the questions comes out like this:
“…Think back to the very beginning of the pandemic.. and think of the terms or phrases that were ubiquitous….
‘we’re all in this together’… ‘solidarity’…
I think what we’re seeing with this downloading of… of how WE’re thinking about the pandemic to personal responsibility…
is a retreat from solidarity and the idea that we’re all in this together….
…It’s more like, you’re on your own… Um so I… I think what we’re really seeing… is… is… once the vast majority of us… have had covid… and perhaps are healthy enough uh uh and have an advantage to think that they’re no longer at risk, um, they’re happy with the removal of measures….
even if that means that some of the most vulnerable of us are… are still affected gravely…”
Now I think is a good time to link back to my first article, describing what “truth” is when you’re talking to Ideologues, who are working on creating their truth, because their truth involves destruction of the things that stand in the way of the Ideological visions and presuppositions about all the main causes for strife in our societies, at least, how they like to think it works, and let’s face it, the WEF/UN/WHO is a pretty powerful group of “partners”, who are all working on creating the reset agenda.
but it’s hidden reasons that I like to think are the ones that we really need to be concerning ourselves with, if we wish to get through this with minimal damage…
I’ll come back to this, but now think about the comments of the good Doctor, who provides, again, a service, for the needs of her customers, or patients, one which she should consider before she concerns herself with the best conditions of the entire public, choosing instead of thinking about her job, to place hyper focus on those she sees as “victims” of a system (that is admittedly not without problems) instead of being hyper focused on her particular “social justice” concerns that place the ideological position of “equity”, over the rights and freedoms of the general population.
Now that is something where a substantial debate about the causes and remedies should be discussed, and in fact have been for decades. Centuries even.
And those discussions resulted in frameworks, often in the forms of “constitutions” to guarantee the rights of citizens to choose how they should be “allowed” to Live their Lives, and those key documents were ofter fought over, requiring bloody wars, to establish those rights to the citizens of a Nation, outside of the jurisdiction of the earlier colonial powers, who sought to keep their colonies docile, compliant, and under control, as vassals of their tentacles of power, always feeding back to the whims and desires of those who saw themselves as having a “divine right” to rule the people under feudalism, often propped up with the support of the Church.
How, then, is this new attempt to put all the things, under the constant observations and jurisdiction of “the science”, in the way these zealots advocate for such an arrangement not “scientism”, with a built in appeal to the new “god” of “data”, that suits the architects of the “Fourth Industrial Revolution”, just fine?
In fact, without the zealotry of true believers like Dr. Nili Kaplan-Myrth, would it even be possible to make the fear based and emotionally supported arguments, based on appeals to the uncertainties associated with “far right freedom” to bow down to this new “god”, that will require along with it the new “surveillance capitalism” model to be fully implemented? I would argue probably no.
Side note, it’s interesting that right now, we are seeing reports for the last several months of an increase in overall mortality that we are being told, without the sensational rhetoric that accompanied the first calls for lockdowns, which seems odd and rather telling to keen observer. Surely if they suspected for certain that it was happening because of repeated exposures to “covid”, they would be running around with their hair on fire, but they curiously are not, so I’d say it’s worth asking why, and that’s all I’m saying.
Perhaps it’s because “lockdowns” we now know unequivocally caused more harm than “covid” itself, and I will make the prediction right now, that if this trend picks up, there will be, yet again, more repeated calls for more “data” accumulation, to figure out what, exactly, is happening, and what is causing this issue, even though, it would seem that a younger, working age cohort that suffered almost zero issues during the initial, deadliest initial “waves” of the more virulent Alpha and Delta strains, when people were more “compliant”, but still cued up through the same minimally offered tills at your local super markets or Walmart stores, where again, the clerks didn’t seem to fare much worse than anyone else, but these lanes theoretically would have been choke points for transmission no matter how much plexiglass the airborne viral particles couldn’t navigate, or of course the dreaded 6 foot clouds that paroled restaurants, waiting for someone to get up for a bathroom break without dutifully donning the magic viral barrier, where there is amazingly still plenty of waiters and waitresses, despite an increase in businesses that could have supported them shuttering windows as they can’t seem to afford the increased costs associated with “Putin’s price hike”.
Those darn Russians, always stepping in to disrupt the disruptions and create further complications that distract us from the revolutionary job that we were already doing, and basically hastening along its aims because they just hate our freedom so much.
Heyyyy….. wait a…
Never mind. I’ll tackle that one another time, this one is already getting epic.
But then again, I did just read this morning via Canadian super genius Dean Blundell that even suggesting we don’t send money and ammo into Ukraine to help prop up the fight against evil Mother Russia makes me a propagandist, although not quite famous enough to make the list with all the other anti war mongering spetsnaz agents like Rupa Sabramanya.
Herself a dissenter for talking to the Russian agents that composed the true inspirational back bone of the Trucker Convoy. Check out this crack pot explanation of all the things that could have or might have happened that we almost kind know because we studied internet traffic and why on Earth would people not from Canada be interested in massive protests erupting in Canada… Huh…? See, you don’t have a decent answer, that’s why it MUST be for some nefarious reason, because that’s not textbook projection.
But back to the point.
“Normal” is the way things were in the “pre covid” World, even with all its warts and flaws, and there were plenty of those to talk about. You’ll get no argument from me otherwise. In fact, in the years leading up to “covid”, I would regularly try talking to people about things like tribalism, misunderstanding, and misattributions of motivation. Largely because I was trying to understand myself and make improvements in my own Life, and the Lives of my Wife and our Children and our immediate environment and situation. Things were certainly not easy before, but at least an individual could know that it was, at least for most people, through their own agency and action, it was possible to work hard and improve your own lot. Personally that lead me to constantly think about what kind of small business I wished to open, and I often spent time reading and writing, and listening to people have conversations about what might be the optimal kind of situation within which Life and people could flourish.
But out of nowhere in March 2020, the cloud of this “new reality” that seems to be propped up with a dysfunctional and unholy alliance of the “public/private partnership” program that is being promoted by the schizophrenic WEF/UN/WHO reset agenda, supported with almost this exact same “language” of “social justice”, but within the confines of a cold hard “corporate psychopathy” that does not recognize or acknowledge the people it hurts along the way has, as an adopted “mission statement”, transgressed into a reset agenda that sees the desire for “freedom” as being out of line with its own machinations and desires, driven by “conspiracy theories” and simplistic fantasies about what is, to give it the moral certainty to push forward, paradoxically supported and enabled by a giant conglomeration of some of the largest power players in the World.
The World that was, before “covid”, was a World, for some, of great uncertainty and “free floating anxiety”. For many, they were being driven into a panic by various “existential threats”, and the increasing number of books, articles, and programs that were all melodramatically emoting about various “social justice” issues and causes, and those who were fully bought in to these narratives about society, the “good people”, the people who also tended to be in close proximity to academia, and increasingly over the last several years to power, were all quite certain that they were involved in a war against the great and ever lurking threat of a return to fascism, even though, in the back ground, the foundations were being solidified and the grounds made fertile for the great push through to the new World they were all envisioning as a possibility, as envisioned by the 17 sustainable development goals, (which are suspiciously linked in orientation to various DEI and ESG efforts on the part of the stakeholder capitalism partners, even if, upon closer investigation, they aren’t what they’re cracked up to be) that are also something that could only ever possibly be realized if there was some means of redistribution, who’s aims might be copasetic with those of the great power centers, like those at Davos, that might help to prop them up, and make them a priority, as if massive reorganization of economic forces by decree is a thing that actually has any realistic path to fruition without massive destruction and disruption along the way.
Again, that is another aspect I intend to get into with greater detail about in a later post.
For the purposes of my argument here, I would like to go back to the zealots and associated toadies and useful idiots that demand we accept their new “post covid” reality’s terms and conditions so that we can better create “equality” (as if simply spitting out slogans and tropes make some reality manifest itself), I’ve been posting pages from and talking about the fact that just a couple of days ago I finished the book “the psychology of totalitarianism“ by Mattias Desmet, and it has since occurred to me that, within his hypothesis , there is about 30% of the population that suffers from a very real free-floating anxiety that compels them to fall under the hypnotic suggestion of and attraction to totalitarianism.
This group tends to be self-selecting but basically they feel as if they have been “atomized”, and cut off from what they see people engaging in all around them, and they feel disassociated from this reality, and feel a lack of meaning, and/or are riddled with existential fears that prompt them to look for a singular focal points to assuage all of those negative feelings and provide yet again, a sense of meaning, and solidarity within the newly formed group purpose, that gives them in turn a newfound sense of “solidarity”, which makes this fellows comments significant meaning, so once again, if you would so entertain me, listen to this Man’s comments, with new ears.
This could be called, for the purposes of those pushing this all encompassing solution, the “task” group, or the “targeted” group, the ones who uncritically accept that all power and authority should be channelled back into an “authority” structure, that in this case, seems have manifested in “the science”.
Interestingly enough there’s a huge overlay with people that appear to have some significant “Trump derangement syndrome”. The timing also checks out, as does the messaging of the DNC who seem to have Weaponized these people for political gain.
And by no means am suggesting that this seemingly irrational behaviour exhibited by people that cannot stand the Man is limited to the hater group, even though anecdotally on my own social media accounts, I have seen people constantly make the assertion, especially universities tracking “anti vaxers” and “anti maskers”, and asserting that these are people who have been weaponized by the words and actions of Trump, when the rational for such reasons seems to be, that they also seem to identify as anti authoritarian, which is itself a paradoxical statement since these educated types tend to refer to Trump with such disgust, often specifically because they claim he acts like an anti democratic dictator or authoritarian.
To recap, they think “anti authoritarians”, have overlap with Trump supportors, and that’s why they are “anti maskers” and “anti vaxers”.
Makes perfect sense, doesn’t it?
May I propose an alternate hypothesis?
In fact the entire period of 2016 through 2020, if we’re being honest, people were a little… unhinged. In fact the majority of media, not only fostered this atmosphere but enflamed and exasperated it with every single day and every hyperbolic, often wildly speculative story. That’s a much longer story, but let’s just say at the end of the day, now we see with the unfolding 4IR stakeholder capitalism reset agenda, it’s totally psychologically plausible to say these voices were largely projecting, which is to say, they were acting in such a deeply disingenuous way, that they were schizophrenically projecting their deceptive behaviours onto Orange Man, and anyone who said that the things he was talking about, not the MAN, but the things he was bringing up, were deceptive and totalitarian, when in reality, they were building the construct; the DEI, the ESG, the NAC, all things wildly anti market in conception and ideological in nature, and they were basically part of an effort to subvert the “rights” of citizens, when their job should be to convey information, instead, they were conveying propaganda via reinforcement of those ideological presuppositions from their own peer groups, all singing off the same hymn sheet about various “existential” threats that it was only proper to agree upon. In a way they were themselves captured by the confines of the status quo reinforced by the Overton window, or the available range of acceptable dialogue, that itself gets shaped by he overall zeitgeist, or spirit, of the time.
And they knew it. When people, speak in a way that is not entirely truthful, or honest, deep down, they know it, and the outcomes in behaviours could manifest as disgust for the person that is pointing it out, and making them feel uncomfortable about what they’ve been up to, especially when it gains so much support, after incredible amounts of a sustained and seemingly coordinated effort to destroy that person, and when Trump won, they was disillusionment, almost across the board by media, who seemed to become increasingly unhinged with each passing year, until they literally channeled all their efforts into defeating him, and then literally bragged about subverting the public will to have Trump continue on with his attempts to put the power back into the hands of the people.
I would be remise to not mention here, that ultimately, he was incapable of leading the country with this much constant interference, and what he did get accomplished, was not without it’s own problems. He was never really given the chance, and when it came time to protect the country from this encroaching Ideological push, he failed.
There was however one thing that seems to have happened as a consequence, many of his former supporters and staff have now led many of his former supporters to conclude, in my opinion, rightfully so, that our way of Life is, and was, under attack, and now many people can see it, and it’s entirely fair to make the connection between people that are pushing back against the reset agenda, and Trump support, but to these people who demonized him and his followers, because of the built in praise for individualistic spirit that built the USA that is part of the phrase:
“Make America Great Again”
it is this way of thinking is largely antithetical to the 4IR reset agenda, with it’s own phraseology, which I ch"eekily like to invert the capital letters on:
“bUILD bACK bETTER”
But back to the original premise, the WHO and Johns Hopkins and the Bill and Melinda Gates foundation and many from higher up in media, finance, and tech, we’re all drilling about what to do in the next “pandemic”, and if you watch those drills, like “Event 201”, drilled November 2019, or read about previous drills that were happening up to two decades preceding as they are described in RFK Jr’s book “The Real Anthony Fauci…”, and you really should, what becomes very curious is the teams obsession with controlling the flow of information, and more specifically, combatting misinformation, above all other things. Make of that what you will.
Now, what the CIA was engaged in from the mid 20th century, from projects such as MK Ultra and all the various offshoots and drills like the Ash experiments, the Millgran experiment, or other such studies, where they claimed it was all about trying to understand what had happened in, for instance, Nazi Germany that led so many people to be involved in such an awful thing, and to be caught up in what experts in crowd, or “mob” behaviour, stretching back to the early 1900’s, had been studying and formulating what has been dubbed “mass formation”, the claim was always, “how do we keep this kind of thing from happening again?”.
Now, here’s the issue. The way that you would keep it from happening, is by making sure things are handled in a measured way, and by keeping open the lines of communication so people didn’t become, again, atomized, or feeling disassociated or cut off from social society, as we are all very, with few exceptions, social animals.
But see, when they drilled the “pandemic” responses, they didn’t do that.
In FACT, they seemed to be singularly focused on channeling all information through their constructed hierarchy, and censoring anything that keeps that from being the only messaging heard, thereby effectively silencing that small minority of non conformists that we know, from studying these incidences, are totally necessary to keep this “mass formation” from manifesting into something more destructive within society.
So to repeat, they Literally came up with a plan to foster EXACTLY THIS KIND OF PSYCHOLOGICAL PHENOMENON, even though certain, high level people must have known that was actual a very dangerous idea, and instead, drilled to keep the relative “sanity” of the non hypnotized group from getting too much exposure, thereby almost guaranteeing this scenario would be exacerbated, and people would be more susceptible to asking for more totalitarian measures to “save us”, and, magically as a consequence, “the Planet”.
Interesting, isn’t it?
Next up on the chopping block, yeah, but what about the Planet..?
Is being a Bio-ethicist a real thing?
I don't think I ever heard of such a "job" before all the covid insanity started.
And if "Bio-ethicist" was a real thing, you'd think it's foundation would stuff like Nuremberg code and Western, Enlightenment values of human rights.
Instead, being some sort of totalitarian ideologue seems to be a requirement for the position.