Trans vs. Meta: Part Three
False Idols
A five-part inquiry into the spiritual, philosophical, and technological crossroads of our time — where AI, identity, and eschatology converge. This series explores whether we're witnessing human transformation… or deformation. Follow the thread. Decide what we become.
📚 Read the series introduction → Read part 1 → Read part 2 → Read part 3 → Read part 4 → Read part 5 → Read supplemental → 📎 Continue to the next part →
Why Informationalism, Emergence, and Gaia Worship All Fail
If Part 2 laid out the fault line in metaphysics, Part 3 turns to its idols.
In the absence of the Logos—the person of Christ as the foundation of reality—our modern intellectual culture scrambles to explain consciousness, value, and meaning through other conceptual gods. These gods speak in scientific terms, wear academic robes, and build consensus through think tanks and Twitter threads. But they are still gods. And they are still false.
Here are the three dominant ones:
1. Informationalism: “The universe is data.”
This is the idea that all of reality can be reduced to information structures—bits, qubits, entropy, pattern. It’s popular among computer scientists, theoretical physicists, and the more poetic transhumanists.
In this view, everything—including consciousness—is simply a function of how well you can compress and transmit information.
But there’s a deep contradiction here:
If all meaning is reducible to data, who interprets the data?
Who gives it value? Who determines what is signal and what is noise?
Information is not knowledge.
Knowledge is not wisdom.
Wisdom is not love.
And love, as anyone who’s ever lived knows, cannot be compressed into a bitstream.
Informationalism offers a map with no terrain, a grammar with no soul, a universe with no heartbeat.
2. Emergence: “Consciousness just happens when things get complex enough.”
This is the metaphysics of hand-waving.
It claims that something completely unlike a machine—human consciousness—can somehow emerge from a machine. That if you keep layering complexity, suddenly awareness will pop out.
But as physicist Roger Penrose and others have argued for decades:
Complexity doesn’t produce consciousness. It just produces complex behavior.
Emergence theory is just a placeholder for “we don’t know.”
It’s intellectual incense waved over an altar of confusion.
Worse, it gives people false confidence. It lulls the builders of AI into thinking they’re on the cusp of creating “real” minds, and gives bureaucrats the moral license to treat humans as interchangeable with machines.
It’s the ultimate philosophical Deepfake.
3. Gaia Worship: “Nature is divine. The Earth must be obeyed.”
Here’s where things get properly religious.
The environmental movement—especially at its highest echelons (UN, WEF, Agenda 2030)—has slowly morphed from stewardship into spiritual servitude. The earth is no longer something to tend. It is something to appease. Progress is sin. Carbon is evil. AI is the priesthood of planetary salvation.
That’s why Marc Carney, King Charles, and the broader technocratic class speak not in rational, measurable language, but in apocalyptic moral tones. The Great Reset isn’t just economic—it’s eschatological. It's a climate Judgment Day, with new commandments, new rituals, and new high priests.
But here’s the difference between Gaia and God:
Gaia demands sacrifice but gives no redemption.
Gaia grants no individual dignity—only collective compliance.
Gaia will not die for your sins. She will only tally your emissions.
All Three Idols Collapse in the Same Way:
They cannot account for the dignity of the human soul.
They cannot explain love, freedom, sacrifice, or grace.
They cannot resist the temptation to power once their theology becomes policy.
And yet, these are the very systems we are trying to program into our machines. These are the logics being encoded into LLMs, governance protocols, and future AI “moral” decision-making.
So here’s the terrifying inversion:
AI Alignment is being defined by people who are already misaligned with Truth.
It’s not a technical problem. It’s a spiritual one.
And we can’t debug it with more data. We need to repent of our idols.
Next in Part 4: The Inversion —
When Science Becomes Religion, and Religion Becomes Software
Up until this point I’ve been producing my stacks entirely for free and I will continue to leave the posts open for everyone to find. But if you would consider supporting me and my work with a one time donation through Paypal I would be eternally grateful.
May God Bless Us All and have Mercy on our Souls.
If you made it this far, thank you. I wrote this not just to critique—but to invite. If you’re ready to step beyond entropy, I’d love to hear from you. Comment, subscribe, or share this with someone who’s still waiting for the reset that only redemption brings.