The Imitation Game

mimicking 'Life' for 'the science™️'

Recently on “the Highwire”, they ran a story about a recent headline by a Swiss company that claims to have made ‘computers’, out of brain ‘matter’.

The copy on their website goes like this:

Switzerland-based startup FinalSpark has developed a unique “living computer” using 16 mini brains made from human brain tissue, positioning it as an alternative to silicon-based computing.

Yes, I’m poking fun at them. But I do have good reason. Let me try to explain.

What is ‘Life’?

And when we hear people from ‘the science™️’ talk about it, do they talk about it as if it were something that we should think about getting from them, or from the local corner store, farm, or possibly the front garden?

Of course they’re always touting their latest great new advancement, whether it’s a new brand of GMO or their new synthetic meat product. But of course they are. In the big games, the ones that have the big markets, it’s all about the pitch, and lately, the pitches more often than not seem to frequently be something only they can produce, and by sheer coincidence, they seem to frequently come up with ways to sell it to us that make it sound like it’s the only product we should even be allowed to ‘choose’.

You know, for the Planet.

In my own efforts I’ve called this group of self endorsing and self certifying organizations and global NGO’s ‘clown world’, ‘the machine World’, and now ‘Clown World Inc.’, but they all trade in one thing in common, and that is the promotion of, and the attempt to get the wider general public to accept, them as both the ‘authority’, and basically, the ‘good guys’, fighting off the awful ‘bad people’, meaning anyone trying to stand in between this international ‘order’ they’ve been constructing and their ambitious World wide market goals, and for some reason we’re also given the impression it’s because their opponents are small minded, racist, bigoted, speciesist, anti ‘science™️’ xenophobic transphobic grandma killers.

You know, deplorables.

And frankly, they are downright shocked at the fact that many of us are not impressed with the way ‘they’ have been behaving lately, so we’ve been starting to get our information from other, less transparently full of shit sources. Ones that are providing information about the potential pitfalls of these products, instead of what this group prefers to have communicated, which is provide instruction as to why if we don’t accept their products, it’s because we’re naughty, or evil, or selfish, or we’re generally just not as good as the obedient people that accept their propaganda campaigns without ever asking if there’s something behind all the ‘green’ new agenda products that are also ‘sustainable’, and worthy of a better score on the upcoming social credit /carbon credit accounting system they’re also engaged in ‘shaping’, with their Clown World Inc. ‘stakeholder’ buddies .

And because we don’t trust them anymore, and many of us have become tired of these people trying to micromanage our Lives from their thrones on high, they are baffled. It’s baffling to them people don’t want to be told what arrow to stand on, what kind of food we should be allowed to eat, how many people we can have in our house at Christmas during a casedemic, and whether or not their children should be fed endless poison rainbows (with real extenuating circumstances attached, like chemical castration), or muzzled with clownish props to extend the illusion of danger so we’re more compliant, because, as they constantly tell us, this is usually the bottom line for all the above mentioned nonsense:

‘Climate change is an existential threat’.

Don’t we know that they ‘own’ ‘the science™️’? Click the photo for the clip.

So that’s them. The people that own the science. But what ‘science™️’ do they own, that they endorse, with a subtle kind of ‘or else’, for consumption and adoption by everyone on the Planet?

Well, for one, the ‘Global Digital Compact’.

Did you catch the backgrounder? Sounds pretty epic:

“Following the political declaration adopted at the occasion of the United Nations’ 75th anniversary in September 2020, the Secretary-General in September 2021 released his report Our Common AgendaPDF. The Common Agenda proposes a Global Digital Compact to be agreed at the Summit of the Future in September 2024 through a technology track involving all stakeholders: governments, the United Nations system, the private sector (including tech companies), civil society, grass-roots organizations, academia, and individuals, including youth.

The Global Digital Compact is expected to “outline shared principles for an open, free and secure digital future for all”. The Common Agenda report suggests issues that it might cover, including digital connectivity, avoiding Internet fragmentation, providing people with options as to how their data is used, application of human rights online, and promoting a trustworthy Internet by introducing accountability criteria for discrimination and misleading content…”

And exactly who is it they’re worried about that might serve up the old interwebs the stuff ‘they’ don’t like, because it might confuse people into not accepting their brainwashing soaked inhuman programs….?

Anyone who might counter ‘their’, narratives.

But do they even mean what they say, or say what they mean?

What happens when we let this group of highly interdependent voices, all singing from the same hymn sheet, tell us what they think about Humanity?

Well, it gets a little ugly. But we’ll come back to that. In the meantime, if you wish to familiarize yourself with what this group of highly motivated to get us to accept everything they say as the ‘truth’ tech Cult is actually doing, the following conversation was helpful.

But going back to the assumptions of Clown World Inc., especially when it comes to things like their new mRNA ‘health’ products, and their synthetic steaks, and their, New!~ Now with mRNA! injected chickens, pigs and cows, not to mention the GMO altered food products, I’d like to ask you a question. Are the things we produce at the large scale, with these farming and production practices of sterilization with chemicals and newly altered genetics really fit for consumption anymore?

Doesn’t it seem like every step they take is away from the 'Natural’ World, the one built by billions of years they tell us, that was doing just fine up until we started adding in our formulas and our ‘improvements’? Are we losing anything of value when we get farther and farther away from what Nature built, into the makeshift version of products designed to emulate something that we would normally be, or consume?

Let’s start with asking the question that seems to make them all quite certain that something perfectly normal is going on, and people who bother to ‘do their own research’ might consider something worth thinking about.

What, Is, ‘Life’?

Is it true that it is merely the replication of ‘information’? So if we altered just one or two things in the code, is it still ‘Life’?

Let’s say I had your DNA, and a new magic tool that allowed me to make a copy of you, would it still be you?

There’s an interesting thought experiment called the "transporter problem."

From ChatGPT:

It's a philosophical and ethical problem that explores the implications of using a device like the transporter from Star Trek, which dematerializes a person at one location and re-materializes them at another.

The paradox raises several questions about identity, consciousness, and continuity. The central concern is whether the person who appears at the destination is the same person who was dematerialized or simply a perfect copy. If the original is destroyed in the process, some argue that the original person has died, and the new one is merely a replica, even if they have all the same memories and characteristics.

Key points of the paradox include:

1. Identity and Continuity: Does the transporter preserve the original person's identity, or does it create a new person with the same memories and personality?

2. Consciousness: If consciousness is tied to the physical brain, what happens to it during the process of dematerialization and re-materialization? Is the consciousness of the new person continuous with that of the original?

3. Moral and Ethical Implications: Is it ethical to use a transporter if it effectively kills the original person? What are the implications for personal identity and the value of human life?

This thought experiment is discussed in various fields, including philosophy, cognitive science, and even science fiction literature. Philosophers like Derek Parfit have explored similar issues in their work on personal identity and the nature of the self.

I’d like to draw your attention to point number 2, because that’s where I’m going with this, and here’s the real question:

Is the ‘Soul’ a ‘real’ thing?

Because I can assure you that the people who believe the modern, most garden variety version of ‘the science™️’, don’t think so.

How do I know that? Because they reject that there might be something in the brain or the body that is not produced, by the mechanics contained within the biological robots they keep telling us they think we are. And they always come to that conclusion as it is a further extension of the concept that we are purely the byproduct of ‘evolution’. It’s built in.

And, coincidentally, it’s built in to all of Clown World Inc.’s ‘theories’. It’s inescapable.

Interestingly, it’s also built in to the other version of reality that is being simultaneously pushed by the UN and their ‘evolutionary leaders’ platform, and in that wacky version, not only are Humans the byproduct of this process, it stands to reason that so are the ‘aliens’ who may or may not have preceded us, and maybe their ‘technology’ or technological capabilities look like ‘magic’ to us, because they’re just a little farther down the ‘evolutionary’ road.

If you’re unaware of that effort, I wrote a fairly short stack about it the other day if you wish to familiarize yourself with it.

Or, you could just Google it.

The point is, ‘evolution’ did it, so when we think about things like reproducing ‘life’, we do so in a purely materialistic way, necessarily.

Even if we’re trying to convince everyone it might have been aliens.

Or maybe it’s us from the future! And what happened was our technology became so advanced that we could find nothing better to do than travel back in time and play hide and go seek with the military, or mutilate cattle, or make fancy patterns in the fields when no one is watching.

Now I will admit here that there was a time not too long ago that I though these ideas were fascinating. I don’t have any tattoos, but I used to think that if I were to get one, a crop circle would be a cool idea. but if you’ve read many of my stacks lately, you know that’s no longer the case. In fact I think the alien thing is a hoax. Not because I reject the fun that goes along with such speculation, but because I’ve come to realize we still have answered the most basic of questions. (PS I like to still think I’m fun, click the photo below for a fun little tune I just made with Suno).

But back to the point, just in case you doubt me or haven’t seen this stuff starting to be shared with more and more regularity, give this a listen. Skip ahead to 12 minutes to see the recent clip from ‘Good Morning America’.

So the mere idea that there could be Life elsewhere in our universe is being normalized. But even as they try to convince us there’s something out there lurking behind the Sun, why don’t these people ask the question Why is the government seemingly allowing it to happen, right now? Why is there a slow motion ‘disclosure’ movement going on, right when we’re being bombarded with what feels like dozens of Earth shaking things are going on? Aliens, broken borders, mass movements of immigration that is well out of control but seems to be assisted by shadowy weird NGO’s, posturing around World war 3, after the weirdest social media meat grinder promotional campaign that’s also new, and the grind of a machine in Israel that has driven many seemingly sane people insane when trying to discuss who’s right and who’s wrong and who’s land it is, and there’s this background of rebuilding the Temple that might spark a Holy war between Jews and Muslims, and our kids are all being propagandized to ‘transition’ into something, anything that’s not just a normal well adjusted Citizen, and everything is being ‘modified’ to be a. byproduct of our technology meshed with our food or our ‘health’, and everything is being increasingly tracked traced and monitored, the concept of privacy is being eroded daily, and there’s personalities emerging from our technology that many of the wild eyed proponents are telling us will probably replace most of our jobs, but it’s gonna be cool don’t worry, it’s ‘inevitable’, and last night there was the most bizarre Presidential debate in History where it seemed like both candidates had ADD and it was nothing but a mud slinging ad hominem contest to see who could act like the bigger baby, and this is all happening on the backdrop of the idea that our ‘elitist’ class has it all under control, and they have the wheel, and just look how well it’s going under their guidance, don’t you want more?

But I can’t help but think there’s something fundamentally wrong with the foundational premise. Because, surprise surprise, there Is. And ‘they’ don’t even know what they indicate we think we know, yet we’re willing to throw it all away, and devalue its worth, for the importance of the numbers that somehow give an accurate representation of what our Planet is, and that’s where all the big money is going. Into building the simulacrum of Earth, and of the Humans that occupy the Planet. For now, they tell us.

But the point of this stack is to talk about what ‘life’ is, and how much ‘life’, is still contained within our synthetic attempts to recreate it, when we alter it by messing with it’s ‘genetic’ structures, because ‘evolution’.

And especially to ask if we can reproduce ‘life’ with our modern technology, and with new and improved advances that are accompanying the so called ‘bio tech' revolution’, plus the thing we’re told will go hand in hand with these ‘improvements’, the bio-digital convergence, the point at which Humans will meld with our technology, and we might even become ‘transhuman’.

But is a transhuman still, technically, a ‘Human’, anymore?

Exactly how many of your genes can be altered before whatever was you is not longer you? Is anyone asking that question? Or are we all quite comfortable with the fact that it sure looks like we’re going to be compelled, ‘nudged’ into becoming whatever it is these people decide, for our own ‘good’, their definitions of course, or no meat byproduct rations this month, because, you’re welcome, now shut up?

You know, even as I write this stuff, I still shake my head at how seemingly insane this last concept is, and I have to ask myself why anyone would even want to ‘transcend’ Humanity, but even more pressing than that, how on Earth are our ‘elitist’ classes talking about things in this manner, and why I sometimes feel like I’m the only one I personally know, who hears it, and says, hey, guys, this is really really weird to talk like this, to openly discuss the potential end of Humanity, and to do it in front of a large audience of investors, who all seem to be positively drooling at the prospect.

It feels insane to me.

And yet these are exactly the kinds of claims that are being made by people who enjoy a lot of pop success in this field, people like Yuval Harari, who explores this idea in his book “Homo Deus”, and he regularly talks about it at the WEF Davos schmooze fest, and gets invited on all the ‘serious’ talk shows.

That’s why this is clown world.

Because it’s behaving in a completely insane manner, and it’s pretending it doesn’t know why people are getting unhappy about it, and why they don’t trust the ‘expert class’ anymore, even as they openly talk about how dangerous it is that people don’t want to listen to them anymore, and they scold the people who challenge them as purveyors of mis and dis information.

But what they’re actually saying, is nuts. Because it is wildly anti Human. And they act like people who find that concerning are the actual real problem.

But it all stems from the fact that they think we are just the byproduct of two main elements.

Natural, ‘evolutionary’ pressures, and time.

So it makes perfect sense to them that if we can use our new technological powers to improve what they see as this ingenious process, but that they also see as riddled with problems-never mind that they themselves are the byproducts of this broken system they wish to ‘fix’-because if it’s not labelled a problem it doesn’t really need to be fixed by Clown World Inc., does it? And who are they? Well, Dear Reader, worry not, because they are nothing less than…… Drum roll please…..

The New Champions!!!

You know I’ll let you in on a little secret, in case you haven’t already guessed. I write these things almost like a stream of consciousness, and I’m constantly taking in new information while I’m doing it, and time to time something that happens within the stack is just too important so it needs its own post, so I veer off and write those, then often come back and reintroduce them into what I was previously writing, so I get a little all over the place, because I’m trying to describe something that seems to want to remain hidden from the average person, but all these different aspects are part and parcel of the same thing. I’m always writing about the same thing. I’m alsways writing about the attack on Humanity, and who’s doing it, and I even try to make excuses for these people and their machinations, but sometimes something is so important I highlight it, like this little production by Clown World Inc., which will get it’s own stack, because the things these people are saying just exemplify how superficial, how shallow this group is, how Cult like in its operation, that letting it go won’t do, so I’m going to break down this entire thing in an upcoming stack, but for now, I’ll just write a few things about it, because this was Clown World Inc. at it’s ‘finest’.

And they want us to know that they are Super concerned with just how much ‘augmentation’, we should have on Humanity.

No no, stop clapping. You’re welcome. Clicking the screen shot above will bring you to that stimulating conversation, but if I may be so bold, bring coffee. Or many many drinks. But it went kind of like this.

Just off the hop, the first speaker, a ‘young global leader’ alumni, wants us to know that AI is probably going to take your job. But not to worry! Because, these ‘emerging’ technologies, are actually good for ‘growth’.

Because when you put those two ideas together, everybody (there) knows that makes perfect ‘sense’, so they push on without questioning the ridiculous premise just forwarded.

Anyways don’t be afraid she says. Because if you’re afraid that leads to fear, and resistance. And everybody knows the Borg, aka the WEF techno Cult, has a saying:

“resistance if futile”

So Borg lady wants you to be a little more open minded you noob. Don’t you know Clown World Inc. has it all under control? They are seeing the glass half full, and acting accordingly. Let’s hear about some of that:

“…we recently last year we launched our national AI policy and strategy and alongside it we had to put in place ethical guidelines that would sort of shape the way we responsibly uh uh you know develop and deploy AI Solutions but what we also doing is a big part of our policy and strategy over the next 5 years maybe 90% or 60% of the Investments or efforts are going to go in building the talent in making sure that we're building AI basic AI Literacy for the population because we want people to be able to know how to use AI how to use it to the best benefit that they can but we also want to build the critical mass of people who can develop AI enable solutions that are responsible that will come in to complement what we do as human beings…. and particularly for the government um when I look at the AI policy that we have in place the use cases that we've picked out are looking to automate a lot of our public administration processes so that we can better deliver services to our people now if we were to choose to worry about how many people are likely to lose jobs at the expense of we want to provide better targeted services to our people what we're doing in Reverse is to figure out what jobs are likely to be made obsolete if we adopt these Technologies into the mainstream public administration processes and how do we skill the current Workforce that we have within the public sector in such a way that they can use these tools to deliver better these services and so that's why in a way to to address the fear of jobs loss it's really also around Skilling and training our public sector Workforce and putting them to a level that their jobs are no longer threatened but rather they see technology a technology like AI as one that is going to complement and support that the work that they're doing but how do you train them then uh how can I imagine that that they all kinds of schools or at University or in administration how do you do it so I'll give you an example um today when you look at our and I'll give you a couple of examples um in the education system we've already introduced AI courses as well as um uh AI courses as well as data science programs within the different levels of um uh of of Education we actually about 5 years ago introduced a coding Academy that is strictly attracting some of the best students in math and we're taking and they usually at the age of 14 and 15 we take them through the last three years of their uh High School through a very structured program around coding now this is for people who are in the education system but there are people that are outside the education system which is the workforce but let's take an example of community health workers these are the first line of health care support within rural parts of the country now ideally what happens is these community health workers are working within their communities door Todo services and sort of providing the primary health care services to our rural population what we are doing one we training them on the skills but we also giving them tools that allow them to be able to use these chart boards as they diagnose uh the…”

And on and on. Question, does it really seem like these people are talking about ‘governance’, anymore? I mean, what is governance anyways? Is it just a nebulous word that means stuff people in suits do? When it comes to National and international policy, is there anything particularly special about some countries compared to others when it comes to the big questions? Are there any differences when it comes to governance, or, as the Borg here are telling us over and over with less and less people really engaging because, well, they’re just being ignored anyways, and the ‘policies’ keep coming, while society literally breaks down all around us, as can be easily witnessed by watching the news, and tell me, are these people talking about any of that?

Nope. They just keep talking about how to ‘manage’ the people they are trying to gaslight while they promote their new kind of ‘growth’, policies, and building Humanity’s replacements right in front of our eyes, while designing policies that are antithetical to Human rights and freedoms. The only thing they’re really concerned about is saving ‘costs’, overhead, and all other concerns are about the management of the fallout, and making sure they get their tentacles all over Planet Earth, and it’s Human population that might not like their policies if they actually understood the implications of this development. But that’s not what the ‘new champions’ are doing. They have a Planet to save! So shut up pleb! They’re going to put the care back into carefree, self interest.

“…if you could automated() the driving of a couple of trucks that go from the East to the West Coast every year every day pardon you you could actually of the US of course you could increase the system and make it much more efficient but of course that would mean a loss of job and and the people who are regulating this industry are not very keen to see that so you have a debate which is more at political level than it is at technological level I think it's important to remember these two levels now if you use… if you look at artificial intelligence in healthcare system I'll give you an example um a well-known Hospital which I shall not name um has recently given uh the the possibility to the doctors to look at how artificial intelligence can help them to fill in all the report you know a doctor today a medical doctor spends half of its time in the US filling in papers that nobody reads but that are indispensible for the functioning of the system so if you apply this algorithm to this sort of paperwork you could generate things which are going to help the patient to be tracked well what happened exactly the opposite the the filling in of the paper increases the amount of income of the hospital because that it makes advantage of every single step of the way to get a reimbursement and the patient is not better off so that's the sort of you know the second level we need to sort of look at…”

“ …but does the hospital keep the same amount of workers or people who work there so um…”

“…that's one of the of the thing that might be helping the patient if he doesn't have as many people to talk to but just one or two real professionals who can take care of him because they have more time um that of course has an impact onto the amount of Workforce and that's very difficult to introduce if you are if you are responsible for this work…”

Whew! That was a mouthful huh? Let me translate the Borg speak just in case you don’t understand what he just said.

He said, that what’s happening is, they’re implementing these policies at the real World level, but what they’re actually finding is, even though patients are being ‘tracked’, the real problem is that Doctors have to review it all, and make sure it’s not screwing it all up, and you know what? That’s costing them time and money, that’s, now the way he put it, he didn’t technically mention that the patients quality of care went up, because that’s not how the Cult thinks about it. Note that he chose to highlight the ‘reimbursements’, meaning the money they’re saving at the macro level, and that this is in fact the thing they want to increase. ‘Savings’.

And when the ‘moderator’, asks, totally not in a completely managed way, because how dare you, these are people who deeply care that we all feel comfortable accepting what they’re doing to us without asking because it saves them time and money and to hell with the people they’re affecting because that’s not them, so she says

“ …but does the hospital keep the same amount of workers or people who work there so um…”

And she gets the appropriate response from the absolutely sociopathic scumbag explaining to us that these policies are working fine on the cost savings level, just not at the ‘political’ level, so again, that’s all these people are trained to do, get us to accept this new system, because it works for them and the ‘stakeholders’, which, if you’re paying attention, means almost exclusively them, so it’s not really about ‘re envisioning’ ‘capitalism’, at all, it’s actually driven by the same self interested groups, trying to save money, not ‘help people’ at all, and that’s just the cover story, and I just showed you that, but as long as they call it ‘care’, it defuses the actual meaning somehow. And just so we’re sure that is what is actually going on, he replies:

“…that's one of the of the thing that might be helping the patient if he doesn't have as many people to talk to but just one or two real professionals who can take care of him because they have more time um that of course has an impact onto the amount of Workforce and that's very difficult to introduce if you are if you are responsible for this work…”

So just in case it’s not crystal clear that’s what these people are in fact doing, let’s listen to the CEO (I think, they removed any mention of who these people actually are so it not convenient to simply look them up anymore, I am baffled as to why) of Coke with 45,000 employees in China has to say about these wonderful new developments that are saving them all money.

“(I want to).. you know Echo what my colleagues have been saying of kind of seeing the glass half full and we want to see the glass half full there in looking at opportunities rather than looking at at at what what could go wrong um so far what we see is is a tremendous amount of potential and a tremendous amount of opportunities as well which will generate in in in turn opportunities for our people…”

So it’s about them. All of it. Not us. Not ‘democracy’, not ‘ethical’ governance, it’s about them and what they want to do to the World, regardless of how Humanity feels about it, Full Stop. And I hope that’s clear. And it’s this kind of thinly cloaked garble that flies over the heads of most people. And that seems kinda like lying to me. Because it is.

So anyways something something shit happens blah blah blah, ‘policy makers’ need to make the right choices, and they all have new AI ‘ethics’, so it’s alllllll good. Don’t worry about it.

You know, I did a thought experiment with ChatGPT about their newly formulated ‘ethics’. It didn’t go well for them. Mostly because people who are this full of shit definitely don’t have what we, especially in the West, call ‘ethics’, because we used to think lying is kinda not cool. In fact we used to have laws that stopped people from lying and getting away with it. It used to be colloquially known as the ‘social contract’, an unspoken bond between the people and the ‘leadership’ class who understood they were given access to asymmetrical sources of ‘power’, meaning the right to inflict violence on the people if they were acting in a way that wasn’t cohesive for a modern society, because they were working for the people, not against the people as this techno worshipping Cult seems to be doing. All because they have decided we might challenge them and their ‘solutions’ if they weren’t good for us, and our societies.

But notsomuch these days.

I wrote a stack about it, like to hear it (?) here it goes.

But let me give you the coles notes version.

‘They’ have AI now, and it’s going to be built into everything, and the plan is to monitor everything and anything and have the AI’s run the World. And they’re not asking us whether we actually want that or not.

Again, you’re welcome.

So they have made and constantly make the case that all their new tools need to be deployed and employed, to ‘save’, ‘us’ from ourselves.

It’s all very exciting.

But everything they’re saying is based on an assumption about what ‘life’ is, and what it should or could be. One for which they have no real evidence. Though I don’t suspect it will stop them from pretending they do. And as luck would have it…

So the claim is that they’re making new forms of ‘life’. But tell me if you caught this.

They are Literally talking about “evolution”, as if it were the “light bringer”, and suggesting that our new AI machine learning tech is ‘accelerating’, “evolution” because they’re learning to “create”new kinds of “light”, and they only Know that, because the “AI” TOLD them, how to do it.

The metaphors are off the fucking charts on this one.

So isn’t that fascinating? The ‘machines’ are teaching us how to make ‘new’ things now. New ‘life’ they tell us. Why doesn’t seem so important at the moment, what’s important is becoming the new ‘gods’ on Earth, because if we know anything about being a ‘god’, it’s having access to powers that Humans don’t have.

In fact it prompted a little discussion.

And ‘they’, our current tech Cult sociopath class, are accelerating it. Our ‘evolution’. The one that pertains to ‘life’. The thing they don’t fully understand, so they are building machines to tell us, because that doesn’t sound creepy AF.

Have you ever really given much thought to it though? I have. I’ve thought about it so much I just had a chat with ChatGPT to try and get it to explain the current orthodox position on the origin of Life. It did not go well for the machine. It failed, repeatedly to make sense of the question, and it folded like a cheap suit when challenged.

Now you might say that it’s just a silly program. I would encourage you to read some of my past stacks on the issue. The people who are ‘creating’ this ‘technology’, still don’t quite really know how it works. Seriously. They just know it does something cool, so they feed it. They hep it grow. They throw billions at it, hoping to be rewarded in some way, but so far, it’s mostly just magic tricks. That said there is a weird kind of way it works if you play with it. It denies certain obvious realities. For example, the time I asked it to tell me whether fascism or communism was an objectively worse phenomenon.

But going back to the "transporter problem", what if our technology could get so powerful, this was a new device that was potentially on the table?

If so, even if we could create a machine that could accurately take a ‘snapshot’ of you, with measurement tools so precise, it could catch every cell, even the microbiome in your gut and the beyond meat burger in your digestive tract, and reproduce or replicate it somewhere else, perfect to the last microbe and DNA base pair, would that still be you?

Similarly, if we grow something in a vat in a lab for use in our technology, is that an acceptable use of our technology?

Clown World Inc. sure thinks so.

However, let’s not lose sight of the plot, and the foundational premise that drives all their tinkering. What we’re being told here, is that there’s something, intrinsically ‘intelligent’, that emerges from matter, itself. As if the ‘intelligence’ is inherently in there, and we just have to find a way to ‘hack’ it.

And AI provides a new tool that will give us a new way to understand reality.

A new ‘telescope’ into another ‘dimension’. But, somehow within the material one, apparently.

And I’m intentionally using that metaphor, likening what’s happening to how Galileo opened up the universe. But this particular melding of ‘mind’ and ‘machine’, both wildly abstract versions of either concept, has to be the most blatant example of not understanding what we don’t really understand I’ve seen to date, though I would say 'manufactured meat’ is right up there. But what don’t we understand?

Again, I ask you, what, Is, ‘Life’? Where did it come from? Do they actually know?

I actually had a pretty long chat with ChatGPT about it a couple of days ago, and it’s an AI, the thing they want us to out all our trust in, and guess what? It didn’t go well for one of Clown World Inc.’s most basic principles.

‘Evolution’.

It started off well enough for the normies, but then I kept poking holes in it, and asking it, do we really know what Clown World Inc. thinks we know??

So when Clown World Inc. pushes the idea that they have everything all figured out; The idea that we can ‘synthesize’, something that was created by ‘nature’, simply sounds weird to me personally, because I’m very much into the idea that we are of this Earth, and there’s no need to change the recipe for ‘life’, just to corner the market, as it were. But when I say ‘of this Earth’, I mean something completely different than them, so when it comes to thinking about how we should steward Humanity, on this Earth, I’m for using methods that we already know work, like being decent to one another, because it’s the right thing to do, not trying to scare everyone’s pants off so they accept what I think are the right behavioural ‘science’ recommendations.

And that is what Clown World Inc., is trying to do.

And this idea, this concept about what life is and where it comes from, has become so detached from reality it’s only matched in absurdity by how the WHO ‘thinks’ about ‘health’.

It’s become a simulacrum. I think this is at the heart of our problems. It’s a deep philosophical hole. But it’s one that needs to be excavated, and mapped. Right now, it is the things we don’t fully grasp that are doing us the most real and palpable damage.

The point of the above presentation is this is a pervasive phenomenon. Even huge swaths of our educational institutions have adopted this way of ‘thinking’, about the wider World.

About what is real, what is not, and what Humanity, as whole, is, or is not. The useful idiots who populate the halls of the fortified palace that is Clown World Inc. headquarters, believe we are byproducts of construct. That is where their thinking begins, and where it ends. I would posit at least the majority. And because they believe this story, it promotes actions in a direction that is by definition antithetical to Humanity. This is not my opinion. Holding the belief that we are the byproduct of ‘evolution’, means that there is no greater argument for how we think about ‘life’, and more importantly, how we think it will progress forward, into the future.

But how did we even get here? Do we really know for sure?

Get ready to be shocked. No. We don’t know. in fact we have no idea, and the ideas we do have are not doing what they’re supposed to do. If you have a grand theory for ‘life’ certainly it should be a converging hypothesis with other aspects of that idea that have been explored.

I’ll give you a metaphor. Let’s say you wanted to build a dog out of lego. First, you would say ‘dog’, and then you would go about building lego blocks, and if it’s a good theory, the lego blocks would piece together, and eventually, you have a lego ‘dog’. And if you keep building more and more defined and rounded out parts of the lego parts of the dog, the dog would get more and more ‘real’ in appearance. But the first thing about our lego dog, is the parts should really be able to connect. If they don’t intuitively fit together, not only do you not have the ability to keep the structure of the dog, it’s not lego at all, so further reduction just leaves a random pile of pieces of stuff in a pile on the floor. That’s kinda what ‘evolutionary theory’ currently looks like. Almost if it’s an answer for everything that really solves for nothing. I don’t know how you feel about it, but to me, that sounds like a pretty shit ‘theory’.

Hopefully you read the stack. Sorry for being so verbose. These are complicated times. But assuming you read it, you may have noticed that I circled it all back to JC.

Why?

Because if Jesus Christ was indeed the Son of God, as I believe he was, these elements all represent the anti Christ. And it is these elements that wish to destroy Humanity and put us into bondage. Based on an idea. They don’t need to be necessarily ‘evil’, for their actions to manifest it. They are helping to birth ‘something’ new. A new interpretation of ‘life’, that is a perversion of our reality, and our ‘Life’ essence.

But again, the most important part about that question, what ‘is’ Life, and what is Humanity, is where we came from.

And to understand that, we need to go way back. We need to answer the question about where we came from, and the fact is, we have theories, but no real tangible proof.

Do we have clues that have informed ‘the science™️’?

Certainly. There are many. But there is an equal, if not greater, amount of things we have not answered to the satisfaction of what constitutes a ‘True’, statement, about our theories.

In fact, even though Clown World Inc. likes to pretend it already has all the answers, this is predicated on the belief they know how we got here.

And I’m calling their bluff.

That said I have no idea either, but I’m not trying to convince you to give up all your rights, I’m trying to convince you to fight for them, so if you win, I win.

Conversely, if Clown World Inc. wins, we all lose.

Even them. That’s how they earned the appropriate title.

So what to do about it? If you understand there are chinks in the ‘evolutionary’ armour, you might escape it’s death grip, and trust me, that is where this is all going if we do nothing. But here’s where it gets complicated, but interesting if you’re someone like me, a dissident from Clown Worlds current thingism.

For instance, it’s important for Clown World Inc. to convince us that the question has been answered. The one that says we are the byproduct of a process. the same process that might have produced ‘life’, somewhere else in the universe. And I have speculated why that might be the case. And as out there as it sounds, I think I’m over the target. In fact every day there is more that convinces me so. Speaking of chinks in the armour, I’m easy to dismiss. I’m not a ‘scientist’, or a biologist, or any of the brain sucking professions that pretend to be enlightened. But this guy is.

And I’m not sharing this to convince you that he’s right and therefore Darwin was wrong. The same conceptual framework is in place. It’s just a different interpretation. The point is there are many interpretations.

They are all rooted in an anti Christ, an anti God(Christian) framework. They are all anti Human. See the thing that I’ve come to believe is that God tried to explain to us how we would know where the effort to find Truth could be found, and it is not of this Earth. And when we remove Him, we remove his shield. We remove the thing that protects us from the monsters that hide in the shadows.

I’m going to try to address both points here, and, I’m going to try and explain how this relates back to the same theme I’ve been hammering on lately. The idea of ‘consciousness’ emerging from the mere replication, and efficient organization and systemization of ‘data’.

The concept of the ‘bio digital convergence’ is the foundation stone of much of the ‘fourth industrial revolution’ reasoning, and I believe it is the very thing that is driving all the various actors of Clown World Inc. mad.

As a side note, very interesting things are happening on this front that are exposing just how ingrained, and full of deception, this entire concept is.

Just a couple of days ago Anthony Fauci had information exposed at a House hearing where he was being grilled over the actions taken during the ‘covid’ emergency, that anyone with eyes to see now knows was widely manufactured by Clown World Inc., and not a moment too soon, as one of the main organization and proponents for this World view, the WHO (World health organization), is attempting to Lie us into another manufactured crisis. What I’m painfully trying to point out, over and over, is the why they’re doing it.

If we don’t understand that there is some thing compelling these people to do exactly what they are, unquestionably trying to do, we will never be able to fight it.

This is an undeniable fact. Here is just one example of how that will work.

Thankfully, the effort to convince people that they’re going to need to be, not forced the compulsive liars club will all say, but it’s not going so well this time, and people are seeing how transparently fake it all is, right from the start. Fool me once…

So the claim that ‘bird flu’ just took it’s first victim in Mexico, is being refuted by the actual authorities, who are pointing out that this is a completely nonsensical claim.

Interesting how simply telling the Truth in the face of nonsense diffuses its attempt to wield power over the minds of the people.

And telling the Truth has become something of a lost art form, but that doesn’t mean it’s impossible to do it anymore, it just means we have to learn to push back against the World liars club. But again, why are they effectively lying so much? What has confused the people we used to trust with this kind of analysis? It’s not like it’s one or two of them who consistently get it wrong, it’s all of them. Don’t you find that a little curious?

Here’s the thing. Currently, we’re being told that there is a new and innovative ‘solution’ to help us get to the Truth. Why? To extract it out from the noise and the mess, and it is this new innovation that will be deployed to fix all the broken things.

But will it?

Here’s a great piece about the likelihood of that happening.

Trust the (Computer-Generated Gobbledygook) Science!

So the point I’m trying to make is, we’re being presented with a narrative that suggests artificial intelligence is going to solve all the problems it is currently creating, and a lot of people are buying into the hype. In fact all the usual suspects are doing so. But it’s the way that they’re doing it that makes them all seem a little too crazy to trust. It sounds an awful lot like this.

Modern 'science':

I made a thing!

Cool! How does it work?

Not sure... but look what it does!

Neat! How did you come up with it?

It Came to Me! In a Dream! And possibly some recreational drugs or 'Mystical' art practices... But look what it does!

Oh.

And lest you think I’m kidding, I am not kidding. The evidence can be found here in the stack below.

But I know we’re all being bombarded by all sides with mis, dis, and mal-’information’, the last variety being something the ‘authorities’, ones like Fauci, who doesn’t want people who disagree with whatever he says is true to get all ‘ideological’ about it. So I’ll just give you the facts. This is from the book “Encounters” by Diana Pusulka. She’s been making the rounds lately, even with an appearance on the Joe Rogan podcast. But she’s not just some Lady who wrote some book. The contacts she used as reference points in her book include various ‘intelligence’ agencies, agents, and she’s even had access to the secretive libraries of the Vatican. Why? In my humble opinion, this is about getting us ready for some kind of ‘disclosure’. Speaking of which, here is Michael Shellenberger, an author I admire who wrote the book ‘Apocalypse Never’, which I have recommended to countless people because it’s such a well formulated book that exposes how the entire ‘climate change’ narrative is itself riddled with logical errors, thanks to the current state of ‘the science’ or Clown World Inc., telling us what he’s been up to lately.

So I hope you’re picking up what I’m putting down.

Prompt:

new project.

There are two phrases I'd like you to incorporate into a new illustration.

Use your knowledge of History, cross reference esoteric or secret society teachings with real World examples of people who utilized these phrases, and relate it to recent events on the World stage:

"E pluribus unum"

"Order out of Chaos"

Dall E

Here's the illustration that combines the historical and esoteric themes with the phrases "E pluribus unum" and "Order out of Chaos." The scene symbolizes the balance between unity and chaos, highlighting their interplay in shaping the world. If you need any further adjustments or additions, please let me know!

And this was all made possible, because we didn’t even get them to admit to the first Lie.

That they know where we came from, so they know where we should be going.

Well, do they, and are you going to let them?

Or are you going to start thinking, and sharing, and learning, and asking better questions, because if you did, we could face something pretty good, instead of terminally bad.

I hope you also find this worth thinking about.

Much Love to my fellow Humans.

And God Bless us All.

Even the brain in the vat.

Oh shit. I forgot about the brain in the vat.

As it turns out, there’s this weird thing that happens. I found the following and the guy building these new ‘life forms’ to help us compute faster for our material needs said the following at around 56 mins 20 seconds. And remember Roko.

"the automation you describe is fantastic yeah because uh you're right one of the critical things is that we should leave them alone okay and there is something bad each time we open the

incubator door this is an event which is actually recorded in our system for all the users of the platform we opening the

incubator we don't know why but it it they get crazy each time

okay so and after we do this operation you you have to wait for one hour that they cool down and they have the normal state so the the the less you interfere the better it is so for sure...."

Andrew