I Love words. It’s fun to use language to get people to both think and smile at the same time. So my Love for words and wordplay sometimes inspires me to create new ones. It’s not a serious effort, I just think it’s fun. We need to have a little fun when clown World is constantly doing noticeably odd and ridiculous things.
One such thing I noticed is regarding the following video. You see, starting around 28 mins 30 seconds, the speaker who gets introduced explains how AI is going to be used to change the World. How it’s going to bring new technologies and news ways of thinking about society that are going to transform our Lives in unimaginable ways.
But that’s not the weird part. The weird part comes in 2 distinct dimensions.
One, the video is from September 21st, 2022. Looking back it needs to be understood, that this was before we saw the massive explosion in ‘AI’ talk, which really started around March 2023, with the release of ChatGPT 4. So that means these people, have been helping along this narrative, since before it became widely apparent that AI was going to be as powerful as it now appears. They were prophesying.
And they aren’t the only ones, but we’ll come to that.
About what? That AI is going to be the new way we find ‘truth’ in all the noise. This kind of prophesying was also done a tonne by the WEF in their fourth industrial revolution books. I have repeatedly tried to point this out, because ‘they’ are largely the reason the last four plus years have made very little sense to critically thinking people in the general public. On both counts, people who know this information see it as not just suspicious, but superspicious.
Two, and this is the other microcosmic part that really shows how false this narrative really is: the video is hosted by youtube, one of Alphabets largest companies, and still the reigning champion of streaming platforms. And on literally all of the videos you can find there, there is always, in the ‘description’ section, a button to show the transcript of every conversation that ever appears on youtube. Some people have suggested that in efforts to ‘train’ more powerful AI systems, these transcripts have been fed through some models as an additional source of ‘data’, and since Alphabet has it’s own AI, Gemini, that makes perfect sense. So the fact that youtube has the capability, and uses it, to transcribe every single video that’s ever been uploaded, it’s superspicious that for this video, the button isn’t there.
But don’t take my word for it, look. Note the ‘subtitles’ button is also off.
It should be there, right in the middle. I’ll show you using one of my own videos that I shot live to youtube, and at no point did I request the transcript button, but it’s there, because why wouldn’t it be there. They can do it, all it ‘costs’ is a little bit of energy, and the byproduct is ‘data’, which we are told is the ‘new oil’, and none of this is debatable. It’s facts.
See that little button above my channel name? I use it a lot when writing new stacks lately to show people that the things I’m trying to highlight, while there admittedly may be a little speculation - okay sometimes a lot, I mean I talk about God lately and who really has the authority to answer that question Lol - on my part, are mostly directly out of the mouths of various actors out there who have some kind of platform to voice it. And as it seems to be the case when I’m writing these stacks, something weird just happened while I was writing it. I had asked ChatGPT about it, and it gave me the answer I was expecting, but as luck would have it, I also made a typo when asking, and I was just going to put the original warts and all screen shot here as I tend to do, because I check my ego to write these stacks as I know the kinds of things I’m saying can be a little out there, but this time I decided to ask the question again, without the typo, and something interesting happened. It changed the answer in such a way that it left room for doubt, and I find that fascinating. That said, the answer is still yes, but with caveats, which is interesting, because the entire conversation is about getting to a new kind of ‘truth’ system, that uses AI to ‘democratize’ information. That means it’s going to be the new ‘truth’ verification system.
But the fact the subtitles didn’t appear on the Boston Global Forum video, is superspicious. Honestly, why is the parent company, one of the main leaders of this effort to create an ‘authority’ on ‘truth’, not putting subtitles on a video that it would be very interesting to feed into the algorithm? When there’s little to no cost to do so? Doesn’t that seem a little…. weird? Maybe it’s nothing, and maybe it’s just one of many little steps that have been taken to obfuscate the facts. Even something as simple as transcribing this wacky conversation makes it more challenging to use as evidence to support my assertions, and makes it kind of more of an uphill effort to expose. So when I’m suggesting these people are saying nutty things about the way that AI is supposed to be an arbiter of ‘truth’, for the future of the Human race, it’s actually acting more like an obstacle creator. One that makes it harder and harder to find the facts that might disprove the assertions of this group, that seems to be setting itself up as the new ‘divine’ authority.
But don’t take my word for it, here’s Sundar Pichai, the CEO of Google (Alphabet) explaining how it’s going to work to an interviewer, just a couple of days ago. Thankfully this one is transcribed. The moment of the comments extracted and found below starts around 4:22.
Interviewer : “…Let's talk about Search. This is the thing that I'm most interested in. I think this is the thing that is changing the most sort of in an abstract way. It's the thing that's the most exciting. - Yeah. - Right? You can ask a computer a question and it will just like happily tell you an answer. That feels new. Like I see the excitement around it. Yesterday you announced AI previews are coming to Search.” That's an extension of what was called the Search Generative Experience, announcing a rollout to everyone in the United States. I would describe the reactions to that news from the people who make websites is fundamentally apocalyptic.
The CEO of the News Media Alliance said to CNN, "This will be catastrophic to our traffic." Another media CEO forwarded me a newsletter, and the headline was, "This is a death blow to publishers." Were you expecting that kind of response to rolling out AI previews in Search?
Pichai: Look, it's... I definitely, you know, I recall in 2010, you know, there were headlines that the web is dead, right? You know, and I've long worked on the web, obviously I deeply care about it. When the transition from desktop to mobile happened, there was a lot of concerns because people are like, "Oh, it's a small screen. How will people read content?" Like, why would they look at content? We had started introducing what we internally called Web Answers in 2014, which are featured snippets outside. So you had questions like that. I remain optimistic. Empirically what we are seeing, you know, throughout these years, I think human curiosity is boundless. - Yeah. - When people come, and it's something I think we have deeply understood in Search, more than any other company, I think we will differentiate ourselves in our approach even through this transition. I think as a company, we realized the value of this ecosystem, and it's symbiotic. If there isn't a rich ecosystem making unique and useful content, you know, what are you putting together and organizing, right? And so we feel it. I would say, through all these transitions, things have played out a bit differently. I think high quality content, users are looking for it.
The counterintuitive part, which I think almost always plays out, is it's not a zero-sum game in terms of AI Overviews. People are responding very positively to it. It's one of the most positive changes I've seen in Search based on metrics we see. But people do jump off on it, and when you give context around it, they actually jump off it. It actually helps them understand, and so they engage with content underneath too. In fact, if you put content and links within AI Overviews, they get higher click through rates than if you put it outside of AI Overviews. - Yeah. - But I understand the sentiment, right? You know, it's a big change. You know, these are disruptive moments. AI is a big platform shift, and people are projecting out, and, you know, this is, people are putting a lot into creating content. It's their businesses, it's their...
So I understand the perspective. So, you know, I'm not surprised. We are engaging with a lot of players both directly and indirectly, but I remain optimistic how it'll actually play out. But it's a good question, but happy to talk about it more….”
So let me translate that for you, and tell you why it’s highly superspicious.
Yesterday I was engaging in some conversations about philosophy on X, and I brought up to the person I was engaging with, the book “Shaping the fourth industrial revolution”, the 2108 follow up to the book “the fourth industrial revolution”, by Klaus Schwab, the CEO of the WEF, at the WEF’s yearly millionaire/billionaire schmooze fest in Davos, the one who infamously said “… the future is not just happening, it’s being built by us, here, in this room!” (paraphrasing). You can watch the actual clip by clicking the screen shot below.
I didn’t actually finish my thoughts in that conversation, but here’s where I was going.
Remember, this is in a book produced by the WEF in 2018.
Here is the forward by Satya Nadella, the CEO of Microsoft.
You may have noticed, that this is not just some things he thinks about stuff, it is literally a prophetic, and managed turn of events, especially if you now look at where we are, right now.
And why are we here? Because the so called ‘pandemic’ allowed these stakeholder partners to greatly advance the plans they already had. They also consolidated a lot of things that will help them in their efforts to create this future they envisioned. Even now, we’re still arguing about what even happened since March of 2020. And the people at the WHO are still pretending they did a wonderful job. This kind of ignorance is not just obtuse, it is an inversion of the facts, yet it appears as if they know they only need to keep this organized effort to seize the mantle of ‘truth’, until some catalyzing event, even in the face of what appears to be a mounting ‘resistance’.
I’ll do a little wild speculating here and predict that whatever it is, my money is on some kind of ‘alien’ deception. I think all the indicators are pointing in that direction, and I’ve written about it multiple times.
But in my mind, there are no aliens. At least, not in the way most people think about them. There is however what appears to be an alien force driving the madness of characters like Tedros right now, and it’s making them think they didn’t just blow any semblance of trust they might have previously held, but public sentiment is saying different, and people don’t trust these institutions anymore. That’s why they’re all now panicking about ‘misinformation’, and why they’re trying to create this new AI ‘truth’ finding mechanism, that will only and always point back to them as the ‘authority’, so it’s not about ‘truth’, at all. It’s the opposite.
It’s all about promoting ‘their’, truth. And their truth is they are Lying about what they’re doing, and why they’re doing it, but if you read the pages I’ve provided above, you can see, not only what they actually believe, but why they want us to believe it too.
And they’re getting desperate.
So that’s what the bio digital convergence Cult is acting like, the one supported and funded and in partnership with the WEF, the WHO, the Gates Foundation, the Rockefeller foundation, and other large corporations and NGO’s, all the ones working on and within the ‘fourth industrial revolution’, ‘bio digital convergence’, reset agenda infrastructure.
It’s important to understand how these people think. They see no issue with this course of action. I’ll now give you a few pages from the book “the evil twins of technocracy and transhumanisim” by Patrick Wood to further emphasize what informs this World view.
So, just to be clear, this entire effort has been shaped since 1992 in Rio, by the UN, and it is now being assisted, propped up, and facilitated by the most powerful corporations and technologies on the Planet.
Now I won’t blame you if you say ‘what else is new…’, because it has now been pretty normalized that this is the direction society is headed, unless of course you’re one of those people who’s trying really hard to not see it because it’s frankly kind of a terrifying idea, and it doesn’t feel good to admit that things on the World stage have radically changed over the last four plus years. Ever since our collective governments ran a collective psy-op on us, one that still has massive repercussions that still reverberate throughout the World because there’s been exactly zero accountability to date for the massive scam they spearheaded, and ever since things have been getting more and more nuts.
The nonsense they are still attempting to impose on the wider World, from pretending obedience masks were actually some kind of ‘health’ measure, to the WHO patting itself on the back, even just a few days ago now, for the excellent job they claim to have done, and the many millions of lives they claim to have ‘saved’ with their efforts, a claim that is diametrically opposed by the fallout and clear damages and can be witnessed as being symptomatic of their apparent disease that have been inflicted from the mob mentality that has infected our ‘elite’ classes.
And they have zero intention of stopping. Headlines I’ve seen over the last few days have made the claim that the pandemic treaty, or accord, or whatever they want to call it because it’s all about the same Ideology, is ‘dead’.
This is simply Not True. Why does it seem like we’re being conditioned to not know how to differentiate between what is real and what is not? Meanwhile, it marches on in the shadows, merely pretending to be about finding the ‘light’.
But even this take isn’t correct.
Because it’s actually Not about ‘profits’, at all.
It’s about changing the system, based on the prognostications of prophets.
‘Superspicious”