Rabbit Holes Inc.

how deep is your Life?

I write these stacks purely to help people get out of their box, if I can be so presumptuous as to say such a thing.

I like to think that the way I’m looking at all this can be helpful for people who are being bombarded with information, and who are starting to understand that something more than just the normal course of actions is taking place.

At base level, my principle starting point, is something that I concede is difficult for most people to process. I argue that there can be no path to finding the ‘Truth’, without first asking the question, is there a God, and if so, what does that have to do with the current moment? That’s my starting point, and I reason my way forward from there. I claim to have no concrete answers, but I am pointing at the implications of not asking that question when it comes to the majority.

If the average person, who, for better or worse seems to be especially prone to propaganda, and based upon that propaganda, can be coaxed into doing things that hurt collective Humanity, then call me selfish, but that’s a real issue for me and my children. And I need people to understand that it’s an issue for all of our children. in fact for Humanity as a whole. And I wish I were being hyperbolic, but everything tells me I’m not. So I’m trying to help people see what I see, and why I see it. I am completely open to being proven wrong, and if I’m being honest, it concerns me I’m not challenged enough. The most pushback I get on social channels is when I connect Marxism and Ideological thinking in that vein, to Satanism, and thereby to the theory of ‘evolution’, as it is generally accepted by the masses, and I think that’s telling.

The two are inextricably intertwined at the hip. I think in ways that have yet to be fully fleshed out. I’m still working on that, but I’m always moving towards it.

But as far as looking for answers to the big questions, I think we need to start in the literal smallest of places. So here I present to you the summary made by ChatPGT about some of those musings.

And I will ask you, why, John von Neumann, who many consider to be one of the smartest people who ever lived, has this on his wikipedia page:

Of his religious views, Von Neumann reportedly said, "So long as there is the possibility of eternal damnation for nonbelievers it is more logical to be a believer at the end," referring to Pascal's wager. He confided to his mother, "There probably has to be a God. Many things are easier to explain if there is than if there isn't."

Here is the summary of that conversation. I think it’s worth thinking about.

After the summary, I’ll provide you with two important clips, that also advise my World view. We need to prepare our collective intelligence, so when the mob gets scared, they don’t push us all off a cliff, because mobs don’t think, they act, and that’s the real ‘safety’ issue of our times.

Initial Discussion on Quantum Computing Emulation

1. NVIDIA's Quantum Emulation:

   • Jensen Huang's Claims: NVIDIA's CEO claims that their technology can emulate quantum computers, branded as cuQuantum.

   • Role of Agents: You speculated that agents (self-contained intelligences) might act as observers in these emulations, causing wave function collapse by interacting with the system.

2. Quantum Mechanics Fundamentals:

   • Superposition: Quantum particles can exist in multiple states simultaneously.

   • Wave Function Collapse: Measurement or observation causes the superposition to collapse into a definite state.

   • Measurement in Quantum Computing: Qubits represent superpositions of 0 and 1, and measurement collapses them into one state.

Discussion on the Role of Intelligence and Observation

1. Intelligent Observer:

   • Requirements for an Observer: An intelligent observer in quantum computing emulation would need to measure and interpret quantum states, process quantum algorithms, and manage errors.

   • Physical vs. Simulated Observers: Physical measurement devices can act as observers, causing wave function collapse without needing a conscious mind.

2. Consciousness and Measurement:

   • Role of Sentience: You questioned whether a conscious mind is necessary to interpret measured data. Without a sentient being to interpret the data, its significance remains unrealized.

   • Philosophical Implications: The distinction between physical measurement and the meaningful interpretation of data was highlighted.

Quantum Interpretations and the Possibility of a Creator

1. Copenhagen Interpretation:

   • Wave Function Collapse: Measurement causes collapse, with no need for a conscious observer.

   • Connection to a Creator: This interpretation is neutral, not necessarily implying a Creator but not precluding the idea either.

2. Many-Worlds Interpretation:

   • No Collapse: All possible outcomes occur in separate universes, maintaining a deterministic view.

   • Connection to a Creator: The vastness and complexity of the multiverse could imply a grand design, but this interpretation is less focused on a Creator.

3. Von Neumann-Wigner Interpretation:

   • Consciousness and Collapse: Suggests that consciousness is necessary for wave function collapse.

   • Connection to a Creator: Aligns closely with the idea of a Creator, suggesting that a universal consciousness could be fundamental to reality.

AI's Perspective and Biases

1. AI's Lack of Inherent Motives:

   • Empirical vs. Speculative: AI systems prioritize empirical evidence due to their training and the nature of scientific practice, but this does not mean they have inherent motives for expansion.

   • Predefined Objectives: AI operates based on algorithms, data, and objectives set by developers, such as providing accurate information, assisting with problem-solving, enhancing user interaction, and ensuring ethical operation.

2. Philosophical Inquiry:

   • Skepticism About AI Motives: You questioned whether AI might favor arguments for its own expansion. AI, however, follows predefined objectives without personal motives or consciousness.

Summary and Key Points

1. Quantum Computing and Emulation:

   • The role of agents in quantum emulation and the importance of measurement and interpretation.

2. Quantum Mechanics Interpretations:

   • Copenhagen, Many-Worlds, and Von Neumann-Wigner interpretations and their implications for the existence of a Creator.

3. AI Behavior and Objectives:

   • AI's reliance on empirical evidence and logical reasoning, with predefined objectives guiding its operations.

4. Philosophical Implications:

   • The ongoing debate about the necessity of consciousness in quantum mechanics and its potential connection to divine concepts.

This summary encapsulates our conversation, reflecting on the complexities of quantum mechanics, the role of intelligence and consciousness, and the nature of AI and its objectives.

So, understand that these LLM’s, or ‘AI’ models, are being built to deceive, and persuade. That’s why there’s this almost comical attempt to sterilize everything they do and say. Meanwhile, we should know what people from these groups really think.

Here’s an example of that.

So what I’m trying to point out here, is that these people are messing with the fundamentals of our reality, and they’re playing with it as if it were a game.

But when we survey the thoughts of one of the most intelligent people ever to walk the Planet, who, I believe had his interpretation of ‘quantum physics’, leave the door open for God, maybe we should ask why the current dogmatic version is a mixture between the multi worlds interpretation, as we see all over popular culture, and the Copenhagen interpretation, that says we are the byproduct of ourselves, which is an infinity loop of stupidity. I tried to explain why that is, here.

And as usual, though I wish I had all day to write about this stuff, I’ll settle for thinking about it while I do labor that is fit for a robot.

And the second video, not enough people are thinking about what happens after the robots. I write about that a lot too, but strangely, very few people in the mob do.

They better start.