Have you heard about the scar new biolab discovery in the United States?
It’s Super sCaRy!! I’ll give you the coles notes version. Apparently, in a small town in Colorado, a building inspector was making her rounds, and noticed something unusual. She saw a hose going into the side of a way in a way that struck her as strange, so she went to the front door, and walked in. There, she found multiple “Chinese nationals”, who were wearing hasmat suits and playing with suspicious looking beakers and lab stuffs and little table torches. For Real.
Thankfully a committee on the CCP made a nice report for us. It says:
The illegal biolab was run by a PRC citizen who is a wanted fugitive from Canada with a $330 million Canadian dollar judgment against him for stealing American intellectual property.
This PRC citizen was a top official at a PRC-state-controlled company and had links to military-civil fusion entities.
The illegal biolab received millions of dollars in unexplained payments from PRC banks while running the illegal biolab.
The illegal biolab contained thousands of samples of labeled, unlabeled, and encoded potential pathogens, including HIV, malaria, tuberculosis, and Covid.
The illegal biolab also contained a freezer labeled “Ebola,” which contained unlabeled, sealed silver bags consistent with how the lab stored high risk biological materials. Ebola is a Select Agent with a lethality rate between 25-90%.
The biolab contained nearly a thousand transgenic mice, genetically engineered to mimic the human immune system. Lab workers said that the mice were designed “to catch and carry the COVID-19 virus.”
After local officials who discovered the lab sought help from the CDC and others, the CDC refused to test any of the samples.
See? It’s really scary. And, it reinforces the idea that the CCP is working against the US, or something. So the CCP was funding the “biolab", in the States, in a haphazard fashion. It reminds me of something but I can’t put my finger on it…..
Oh Yeah! Hey wasn’t Anthony Fauci funding a biolab in China a few years ago that was working on gain of func… I mean, Totally not gain of function stuff, but it was just experimenting with furon cleavage sites with a little help from that weirdo who headed that WHO who is also in bed with the CCP, And the CDC.
So they’re all doing that kind of stuff. Here’s an excerpt from an official report out of another house committee that looked into the origins of “Covid-19”, from page 15:
…. The WIV conducted genetic recombination experiments as part of its coronavirus research in both BSL2 and BSL3 laboratories.112 The WIV also conducted transgenic humanized mice experiments to assess the pandemic potential of SARS-related viruses.113 They also tested the efficacy of vaccines in these mice and other animal species. 114 These animal experiments generate highly-infectious aerosols that are “ubiquitous… and are difficult to detect.”…….
…By 2018, the WIV showed interest in finding SARS-related coronaviruses that used human ACE2 receptors to enter cells in order to determine whether SARS antibodies would effectively neutralize those viruses.120 This research effort is described in a March 2018 grant proposal submitted to the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) by a consortium of research entities, including the WIV, led by the U.S.-based non-governmental organization EcoHealth Alliance. The group proposed to collect and conduct genetic recombination experiments on SARS-related coronaviruses possessing specific traits making them “high-risk” for zoonotic spillover into animals and humans.121 Notably, the proposal describes the WIV’s intent to search for SARS-related coronaviruses with potential to bind to human ACE2 receptors and that have naturally occurring furin cleavage sites in Yunnan Province, China. 122 According to the proposal, if WIV researchers were unable to find a SARS-related virus with these traits during sampling expeditions, they then proposed to manipulate the ACE2 receptors of SARS-related coronaviruses to increase binding affinity to human lung tissue and to insert furin cleavage sites at the same location where one appears in SARS-CoV-2.123 This proposal was not ultimately funded by DARPA. Furin cleavage sites are known to enhance virulence and increase viral replication in avian influenza and Ebola viruses. The grant proposal is in line with research trends in the field of virology in China. In 2015, researchers at Huazhong Agricultural University in Wuhan inserted an artificial furin cleavage site in Porcine Epidemic Diarrhea virus (an alpha coronavirus).124 In 2019, researchers in China inserted a four amino acid furin cleavage site into Infectious Bronchitis coronavirus that affects poultry.125 The WIV also received funding from PRC government agencies for research examining the spillover potential of SARS-related coronaviruses. 126 In an interview with Science, Shi Zhengli, a senior scientist at the WIV and SARS-related coronavirus expert, disclosed that her team infected civets and mice that expressed human ACE2 receptors with chimeric SARS-related coronaviruses. 127 The results of these experiments indicated that SARS-related bat coronaviruses could infect and cause severe illness in humanized mice.128 The WIV was later terminated as a sub-grantee by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) for failing to produce its laboratory notes and other records relating to these other experiments.
So in Other words, the CDC of the US and the CDC of the PRC (Peoples republic of China) were doing exactly this kind of research, and were funding it there, with a little help from Peter Daisak, who headed the infamous WHO report that said no way did “Covid-19” come out of a lab. It was “zooinotic”, they said. But I willing to bet that if you were involved in research that was messing around with these kinds of things and you understood that meant that if people actually got hurt with the kinds of stuff you were messing around with, it would probably be a bad idea to suggest people point at you. You know, just because of the whole business model and everything, it wouldn’t be much good for raising funding for your projects if people thought you were a serial killer is what I’m saying.
But that’s old news. This is new news. And it happened in our own back yard, right under our noses. In fact if we take the time to hear about this story, it’s so preposterous, it’s kind of hard to believe. Call me skeptical. They do a great job going through that story on the High Wire.
Here’s why I bring it up.
There’s been something kind of strange going on, hasn’t there? You know with the way the CDC has behaved for the last few years? The clearly nutty things they’re repeatedly said? The fact that they seem to refuse to give up on trying to frighten people? With the ridiculous masks, and the standing six feet apart, and the winters of death and the ok to march if it’s for ‘social justice’ stuff? I would link all that but the odds are if you’re reading this, you came looking for it, and you already know all that. But trust me, it’s been weird. And the people at the CDC have been exceptionally weird. Incompetence doesn’t even come close to adequately describing their actions.
But this new story had a twist that they go over on the Highwire segment.
The fact that, after the news breaking of this “biolab” being discovered dead smack in the middle of North America, after years of basically trying to incite paranoia about every potential encounter with a viron or a monkey pock, or god forbid some horrific version of ‘unequal’ treatment of someone by someone or something else, when it came to hearing about this story, they basically gave it a big yawn and passed the Jedi hand past our faces and gave us a big ol ‘…these aren’t the germoids that you’re looking for…’, and went back to whatever it is they actually do there. Developing drugs or something.
Isn’t that a little bit…. strange? That they didn’t even care and told everyone else who they obsessively have been telling what to care about for years not to care either?
The entire situation is So Clown World.
And providence strikes again, as I was just looking for a fun graphic to poke fun at clown world, and the X handle known as clown World just reproduced this gem from the CDC. You cannot make this shit up. Click on the picture for the link.
So it appears that people want us to blame the CCP, but we’re working, largely with the CCP, to create a situation that is just So screwed up, there’s no ‘conventional’ way to fix it. but as if it wasn’t already confusing enough, there’s also this little problem with plasmids, and screwy mRNA batches courtesy of the so called bio tech revolution known as mRNA technology, that isn’t anywhere close to being as straight forward a thing as the CDC keeps suggesting it is.
In fact, it Looks like everything is getting straight up FUBAR’d.
Let’s look at just a couple of recent examples. One, from October, brought to us by Kevin McKernin, and the ‘World Council for Health’, a story with the headline
“Urgent Expert Hearing on Plasmid DNA in C-19 mRNA Vaccines: Everything You Need to Know”, from the article:
…the first presentation was by Kevin McKernan who explained that he had sequenced nucleic acid in Moderna and Pfizer vials and found that as much as 35% was DNA from bacterial plasmids. This finding has since been confirmed by various other laboratories, including in the USA, Japan, France, and Germany, with a recent study finding DNA in all 24 vials tested.
To be clear, there should be NO DNA present in the vials at all!….
And:
…Despite far fewer people now receiving the Covid shots, the number of reports of adverse events continues to rise. Dr Peter McCullough identified four domains of adverse events, namely cardiovascular, neurological, immunologic, and—the one that may be most directly influenced by DNA contamination—oncogenesis.
Indeed, the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) is now reporting large numbers of cancer cases, including rapidly developing ‘turbo cancers’….
Yikes. That sounds terrible does it not? I can’t help thinking that people who got those things might get a little concerned if they heard stuff like that. You can find the whole article here.
A good deal of this research and spearheaded effort is brought to us by the fellow I previously mentioned, Kevin McKernin. So who is he?
Dr Kevin McKernan, previously the Research and Development team leader for the Human Genome Project, who discovered the presence of plasmid DNA in the Covid shots
That seems interesting, does it not? he was previously the team leader for the Human Genome Project? Listen I’m the last one to play the guilt by association game, because it’s silly, everyone who works in the field of health is then by definition ‘guilty’ of working with someone else who did some shady stuff when it comes to human health, so that bird doesn’t fly for me, However, I am a huge proponent of trying to understand peoples motivations by looking at what they ‘believe’, and Kevin, is a former leader at the Human Genome project, and these efforts he’s leading now, are related to using the same methods to detect ‘problems’ with these genetically oriented efforts of the last few years, and thereby somewhat reinforces the narratives. And I’m not blaming him for doing that. It’s way out of my pay grade, and I’m just a layman, so i honestly don’t know why he believes what he believes, but I am almost certain he has good reason to believe it.
The next story I’ll point to is again related to a relatively new breaking story about batch qualities, and ‘reading’ errors within the cell copying mechanism itself, known as the ribosome. This new headline from Igor Chudov reads: “Covid Vaccines Produce Random Junk Proteins Thanks to an "Invention" Which Coincidentally Won the Nobel Prize”.
So again, I’m not saying anyone is ‘guilty’, of anything. I’m just pointing at all the various ways of looking at the situation we see unfolding in front of our eyes, and I just wanted to point out that it seems as if it’s something that average people, living average Lives, trying to address these ‘problems’, in the same old ways we used to address them, simply won’t be able to. It’s almost like these people who are creating these ‘whistleblowing’ reports and such, using and relying on the same kinds of means and methods used to create them, are all kind of clamouring for ‘new ways’ to address what sure looks like some new kinds of problems.
I tried to talk about that idea in a recent post entitled “Data data everywhere the data…”, a hint back to the old song “Signs”, suggesting that the road forward was to be ‘dealt with’ in the same manner that it’s being so screwed up in the first place.
What I’m saying is that all of these issues and peculiarisms and new World problems are going in a certain direction. They All Are, and it appears as though this was the Only direction that any of us could have possibly gone, right from the start.
I’m not going to draw any conclusions here. You can do that for yourself. I think that most people mean well, that’s my disposition, and, I have a tendency to reject the idea of some ‘grand conspiracy’, in favour of the idea that everything is just sort of happening this way, and it’s because of our collective confusion, it’s being allowed to continue to happen, but if there were some things I Do find troubling about the direction of it all, it would be that we have clear and present evidence of collaborators, who all believe in an idea, about Humanity, and the role of our technology.
So as I like to do, I’ll end with a short conversation I just had with ChatGPT.
It’s worth noting that the concepts of the “Fourth Industrial Revolution”, the WEF and it’s ‘great reset’ And the initial philosophical groundwork for agenda 2030, all happened between the 70’s and 90’s. And here we are Today. And this is how they saw it then:
User
what can you tell me about the book "the First global revolution", produced by the Club of Rome?
ChatGPT
"The First Global Revolution" is a book authored by Alexander King and Bertrand Schneider, both of whom were co-founders of the Club of Rome. The book was published in 1991. The Club of Rome is an international think tank that focuses on global issues, including environmental sustainability, economic development, and social justice.
The book is a follow-up to the Club of Rome's earlier and more well-known report titled "The Limits to Growth," which was published in 1972. "The First Global Revolution" builds on the ideas presented in the earlier report and delves into the challenges facing humanity in the 21st century.
One of the central themes of the book is the idea that the world is facing a "global crisis" that requires a new way of thinking and organizing societies. The authors argue that traditional political and economic structures are inadequate for addressing the complex and interconnected challenges that the world is confronting. They call for a new form of global governance and cooperation to tackle issues such as environmental degradation, resource depletion, and social inequality.
The book also introduces the concept of a "common enemy" that could unite humanity. The authors suggest that the fear of environmental catastrophe or a global threat could serve as a catalyst for international collaboration and collective action.
While "The First Global Revolution" has been influential in shaping discussions about global governance and environmental sustainability, it has also faced criticism. Some argue that the emphasis on a common enemy and the need for a crisis to drive global cooperation can be overly pessimistic or even manipulative.
Overall, the book is an important contribution to the discourse on global challenges and the need for collective action, and it reflects the perspectives of the Club of Rome on these issues.
User
can you give me a breakdown of some of the main themes discussed in the book, and more specifically can you tell me if the suggestion of the book, if I can read it as its cover suggests, is to 'provoke' a global revolution?
ChatGPT
Certainly, I can provide a breakdown of some of the main themes discussed in "The First Global Revolution":
Global Interdependence:
The book emphasizes the increasing interconnectedness of nations and the global nature of many contemporary challenges, including environmental issues, economic interdependence, and social dynamics. It argues that traditional national boundaries are becoming less relevant in addressing these challenges.
Environmental Crisis:
Building on the ideas presented in "The Limits to Growth," the authors stress the urgency of addressing environmental problems, such as pollution, resource depletion, and climate change. They argue that a global perspective and coordinated efforts are necessary to overcome these challenges.
Need for Global Governance:
The book advocates for a new form of global governance to address the complex and interrelated issues facing the world. It suggests that existing political and economic structures are insufficient and that a more unified and cooperative approach is required.
Common Enemy Concept:
A notable theme in the book is the idea of a "common enemy" that could unite humanity. The authors propose that the fear of a shared threat, whether it be environmental degradation or another global crisis, could serve as a catalyst for people to come together and work towards common goals.
Role of Individuals and Communities:
While advocating for global solutions, the book also recognizes the importance of individual and community actions. It encourages grassroots efforts and societal changes at the local level, suggesting that a combination of local and global initiatives is necessary.
As for the suggestion that the book aims to "provoke" a global revolution, it's essential to note that the term "revolution" in this context doesn't necessarily imply a violent or abrupt overthrow of political systems. Instead, the authors suggest a revolutionary shift in thinking and governance structures to address global challenges. The call for a "revolution" in this context is more about a fundamental and transformative change in how societies approach and solve global problems. It's a call for a paradigm shift in political, economic, and social systems to better respond to the realities of a globally interconnected world.
User
I've heard it suggested the authors conclude that the 'common enemy of man', that you've alluded to twice, was concluded to be 'Man'. Is this correct?
ChatGPT
Yes, that's correct. The famous quote from "The First Global Revolution" is often cited as follows:
"In searching for a common enemy against whom we can unite, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine, and the like would fit the bill. In their totality and their interactions, these phenomena do constitute a common threat which must be confronted by everyone together. But in designating these dangers as the enemy, we fall into the trap, which we have already warned readers about, namely mistaking symptoms for causes. All these dangers are caused by human intervention in natural processes, and it is only through changed attitudes and behavior that they can be overcome. The real enemy then is humanity itself."
This passage suggests that the authors argue for the concept of "humanity" as the common enemy in the sense that many of the global challenges mentioned, such as pollution and environmental degradation, are the result of human activities. The idea is not to cast blame on individuals but to emphasize the need for a collective change in human behavior and attitudes to address these challenges. It underscores the importance of individual and societal responsibility in creating a sustainable and harmonious relationship with the environment.