In the last piece I tried to describe the indescribable. I tried to communicate my comprehension of the elephant to the other blind men, but beyond the physical size and shape of it, there’s a deeper significance to what is happening in our World today.
To sum up what I suggested in part one, Humanity is under sustained attack by the ‘machine World’, and ‘its’ prerogatives and concepts about what is ‘reasonable’, and what is ‘not’, and I tried to suggest it is that conflict is the main source of the strife between ‘Humanity’ and this ‘borg’, or ‘matrix’ or machine World mindset. I also suggested that most people can’t see it, even people who may be involved in unfolding this will upon our World, the World of Humanity, who I have often referred to as ‘useful idiots’. And for the record I don’t begrudge any reader who stumbles across my writing for not wanting to hear what it is I’m saying about ‘its’ various properties that may not align with their interpretations of how to think about all this. How could I? That would make me just as inhuman as the ‘machine World’, and ‘it’ would still get more of what ‘it’ wants. Yet I tend to agree the ‘machine World’ does not appear to be acting independently.
Conformity Breeds the Same
Over the last four years people from all walks of Life have been randomly speculating about what might be happening on our Planet, and various camps or tribes like to think they have the ‘right’ way to approach the problem of ‘solving’ this ‘puzzle’.
What I’m suggesting is thinking if we simply point out the bad actors, remove them from the equation, we just get to go back to ‘the way things were’ previous to all the seeming madness brought forth into the World since around 2020 and the beginnings of the so labelled ‘covid-19 pandemic’, so it’s only natural people thinking about things in this way should come to the conclusion, all we have to do, is identify ‘they’, who ‘did it’, but where I diverge from most in my description, not to say that many others say things similar to what I’m attempting to describe, but I have repeatedly rejected the idea that this is as simple as finding the guilty smokey room full of bad actors and arresting ‘them’ as a means to restore ‘order’ or ‘justice’. In fact I see thinking about things in that way as an obstacle in and of itself. So my contention has been if we just try to find out ‘who’ is doing ‘what’, we can’t understand what’s ‘feeding’ the ‘elephant in the room’, thereby in not addressing the issue directly, ‘it’ continues to grow bigger, stronger and more advanced, eventually to the point we can’t comprehend how ‘it’ is being given ‘guidance’ from that perspective. In fact that’s something that’s often floated by the ‘AI’ machine World pushers. They tell us that the systems we’re building will be so advanced, so much smarter than ‘Humans’, ‘it’ will be able to tell us things that we should do about any given situation, and we won’t even have the capacity to understand how or why it suggested that course of action, but we should listen, and react accordingly. In fact this is part and parcel of this movement towards the thing the machine World already wanted, way before we started talking this way.
The main push of the 4IR reset agenda is towards digital ID. None of this works without it. ‘It’ pushes and pulls, but it’s main objective is the subjugation of Humanity, and to get there, it needs to be able to ‘measure’, us, so it can ‘calculate’, but without the digital ID, the whole concept falls apart. That’s why I’m so focused on it.
To wit, I agree there is guidance, where I diverge on the question is where is that guidance coming from.
This is a depiction I attempted to create to visualize this idea with DallE.
Here’s how I instructed DallE:
**In a play off of the classic tale of the blind wise men and the elephant, we see a room with a giant elephant and many people, who we’ll call ‘researchers’, but the elephant itself is made of a kind of digital information construct, and instead of seeing the elephant, all the ‘blind wise men’, represented by regular people using various methods or gadgets or resources to examine it, are looking for answers or information about it but they are essentially blind to the elephant itself, and that elephant has been initiated into a ‘demonic’ direction, almost as if feeding off the various ‘researchers’ in the room, and is growing larger and larger, while the Humans are still examining differing aspects of the elephants construct through inter-dimensional portals, in an effort to conceptualize what it is they’re actually looking at, instead of simply turning around and seeing the elephant, which leaves the only real influential force whispering in the elephants ear as a hybrid robot demon made of technological advancements, guiding it and similarly ‘feeding’ off of the contributions of the various Human contributors, who don’t even know that it’s there. But within that room there is one divergent Human who is attempting to call attention, not only to the elephant, but specifically to the technological robot demon on its back, whispering in its ear.**
That is, in a nutshell, what I’m attempting to do, in my Humble opinion, and a decent way to think about the obstacles I keep rubbing up against. We must see this as the thing it is, an Idea that is attacking Humanity. A ‘narrative’, about us.
Think of the entire Human race as being in the room with the elephant, with each blind, but wise Man, trying to describe it. It has many parts that could be seen as many things. But when we try to understand what makes Humanity unique in the animal kingdom, describing the ‘parts’ traps you in one World view from which to conceptualize around, or down one avenue of thinking or rabbit hole, and the net result is we end up with very few people ask what the elephant wants, or where it’s ‘growth’ is coming from, because they are stuck within one frame of reference or the other, but that’s not what the elephant is doing, and that’s definitely not in contention with what I see as a demon force, influencing various different useful idiots contributors to assist it and the elephant in its manufacture or manifestation.
The reasons are actually not that complicated if we can wrap our heads around them.
The World is physical. Material. But the elephant is not just ‘material’. It is animated. Alive. And in the book “The Coddling of the American Mind”, Jonathan Haidt tried to explain how to think about the elephant in a completely different way. He tried to introduce the all important ‘metaphysical’ element of the creature.
So the elephant is not just invisible to most people, where it’s ‘going’ and how it is ‘growing’ is also invisible, which adds in an entirely new ‘dimension’ of variables to the problem, adding another layer of complexity to the riddle of how to explain it.
So I contend that our ‘dilemma’, the main problem facing Humanity at this precise moment in time, is there aren’t many people out there who have fully comprehended just what is going on here, and even for myself, to think about these things does cause me distress, but not as much distress as I might feel if I didn’t at least try to do something about it, in whatever capacity I can. Honestly, I don’t know that it can be stopped, but the choice that I personally have made is to say, ‘No’, and I think there is great power located within this stance, which is why I’m trying to convey that Idea to anyone I can, because there is power in numbers, but even more importantly than that, there is Power in Ideas.
Interestingly my older Son was just sitting here with me and said something that sparked another aspect of awareness, and being the person I am, I often use the questions they ask me to try and describe something about the World that they’re not yet considering, so that one day they might be able to do this kind of ‘abductive reasoning’ thinking about the World on their own. He asked me “Dad, is there really such a thing as military school..?”, to which I replied “Of course there is yes…”, and he followed up with “… I bet it’s boring. why would anybody want to go there??”. I tried to explain that in fact “… it’s good that we have people who learn how to think about things in a detail oriented way, because many people that go through military ‘training’ become very competent members of society who are good at organizational details and creating real World approaches to complicated challenges, and they often provide an outsized contributions to society as a whole, it’s just unfortunate it, generally speaking, it has to be in this pseudo war or defensive minded footing, but that’s just how it works…”. I’m paraphrasing of course, but that was along the lines of what I tried to say. And I said it because it’s True. We do as a society need to think about things in a practical goal oriented way in order to simply get anything done. But the pitfall with that way of thinking about the World can lead people into scenarios like I depicted above with the elephant, and it can turn too technical, too detail oriented, and the people ‘helping’ to build our futures can become too focused on their own screens or agendas, and that can lead us into Totalitarian mindsets, even if they resemble some sort of attempt to create ‘safety’.
For instance, people who try to convince others that there is no such thing as 'Free Will', are telling us more about themselves than they are anything else.
I find it fascinating that what they're actually trying to tell us, is that they don't ‘think’ that We have Free Will, so everything they ‘prescribe’ about what to do about any given situation can be 'justified', by applying that lens to society and how to ‘think’ about it, but in practice this tends towards ‘proscriptions’ for society. There’s a very important distinction there. To ‘prescribe’ something means to make a law or a rule about how to think about it, whereas to ‘proscribe’ something means to remove something from the equation in a ‘prohibitory’ fashion. Perhaps something that makes the situation ‘problematic’. And what I’m suggesting ‘it’ wants to remove from the ‘equation’, is various Human Freedoms in exchange for some pretty wild promises.
In particular, many self identified ‘atheists’ often evoke their pure ‘reason’ as a substitute for a way to think about ‘ethics’, especially when it comes to matters of the Human race and our role on the Earth.
Right now we have Robert Sapolsky running around telling people they don’t have ‘Free will’, and at the same time a disgusting character by the name of Yuval Harari saying the same thing to all of his useful idiots sycophant buddies who all nod like automatons working for the emerging beast system of control.
See how that works? They don’t believe we even have it, so there is no ‘ethical’ argument against removing it from the ‘equation’.
Here’s another disturbing aspect of this war that people who might be reading this would and should find ‘triggering’, but the Truth can hurt, and it unfortunately can hurt even More if we try to ‘run away’ from it; Even those who might reject this encroachment of the machine World by being proactive, even if they manage to build a scenario to live ‘off the grid’, they simply don’t understand what is actually targeting us, the Human race, for destruction, and this is a concept I have attempted repeatedly to convey to people through my social portals, because what they can’t seem to understand is that is the ‘dissidents’, that this ‘machine World’ is being constructed, precisely, to ‘solve’, for.
So the problem that the machine World wants to ‘solve’ for, especially in terms of a ‘cyber security’ scenario, is the dissident, who, because of the war footing that the machine World itself has enflamed, is the ‘adversary’, because unknown variables are the obstacle to what the ‘machine World’, wants.
End of Part two
You can find links to all parts below.