In the previous parts to this series I tried to lay out just how difficult it is to get someone to look at something they don’t really want to see, or think about things that might bring them discomfort. I also tried to point out out that this war we seem to find ourselves in between the ‘machine World’ and Humanity, is using the soft underbelly of the things we don’t actually want to know, and utilizing our tendency to search out easy answers to challenging questions as a weapon against us. This weapon works so well because we are the ones who sharpen it. We feed into it. We help it to grow. And it really takes on the part of the clandestine operators is to pour a little fuel on the fire, and then they just stand back and watch it burn.
So what is ‘fifth generation warfare’?
Fifth-generation warfare (5GW) is warfare that is conducted primarily through non-kinetic military action, such as social engineering, misinformation, cyberattacks, along with emerging technologies such as artificial intelligence and fully autonomous systems. Fifth generation warfare has been described by Daniel Abbot as a war of "information and perception".[1] There is no widely agreed upon definition of fifth-generation warfare,[2] and it has been rejected by some scholars, including William S. Lind, who was one of the original theorists of fourth-generation warfare.[3]
See that clever little denial at the end? That’s how it essentially works. If people don’t know what to believe, it seems as if they diverge into two main camps.
The ones who accept the narrative, and the ones who don’t.
The ones who accept that this is all just the normal course of things reinforce the strength of the programming because people, for better or for worse, are tribal, and yes, they are ‘sheep’ like in the way they crowd together around ideas, and pick ‘shepherds’ to follow. If what the Matrix is doing right now net benefits them, and they remain ‘comfortable’ in their interpretation of what the machine World is doing, they by default enhance it’s capabilities, and reinforce its narratives. They are the ‘army’ this new fifth generation warfare battlefield uses against those who have not yet accepted the programming. Again, this is a war for our Minds:
Characteristics
Alex P. Schmid said that fifth-generation warfare is typified by its "omnipresent battlefield", and the fact that people engaged in it do not necessarily use military force, instead employing a mixture of kinetic and non-kinetic force.[7] In the 1999 book Unrestricted Warfare, by colonels Qiao Liang and Wang Xiangsui of the People's Liberation Army, they noted that in the years since the 1991 Gulf War, conventional military violence had decreased, which correlated to an increase in "political, economic, and technological violence", which they argued could be more devastating than a conventional war.[8] On the contrary, Thomas P. M. Barnett believes that the effectiveness of fifth-generational warfare is exaggerated, as terrorism conducted by individuals, such as Timothy McVeigh or Ted Kaczynski, lacks the support of more organized movements. This was seconded by George Michael, who noted that in the United States, gang violence was responsible for far more deaths than lone wolf terrorist attacks.[9]
L.C. Rees described the nature of fifth generation warfare as difficult to define in itself, alluding to the third law of science fiction author Arthur C. Clarke – "any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic."[10]
A war for our minds, conducted by deploying new technological capabilities, that are ‘indistinguishable from magic’.
So this is literally people that work for the machine World, using ‘magic’ to control the minds of the citizenry, who they are utilizing, unbeknownst to them, to fight against people who have not yet accepted the ‘new’ programming.
I need this to really sink in.
They are using our new technological capabilities to change our World into their desired machine World. One that can be connected to the infrastructure they are building. And again, none of this is hidden. Take this video I’ve shared several times on my social media portals from 2018, produced by a group called the '“World Government Summit”, (I know, subtle right?), who just happen to be ‘stakeholder partners’, or ‘business’ ‘partners’ of the WEF. What’s so interesting about the WEF is people that have accepted the programming, and people who haven’t, both know who they are and what they’re doing, but dependant upon your level of initiation into the machine World, you may see them as a ‘Saviour’, organization, a guiding light leading us into the ‘fourth industrial revolution’, or, you may see them as the source of most of the evil things some people have intuitively recognized as the kind of borg control center that sucks in minds and spits them out reprogrammed into the machine World to do it’s bidding, and I don’t see that as an accident.
Hopefully you watched the short video, and if so, you will notice we’re currently still in the ‘transition phase’, as these people dictated would happen, in 2018. Guess they just got lucky with the whole ‘covid’ thing, huh.
Speaking of the transition, or more like terraforming of Earth, turning our World from what it was to the projected one they’re building with a digital twin World of abstract Humanity they plan to use to control… I mean ‘help’ us with, I attempted to get DallE to depict this, and interestingly it’s being built with it’s own ‘alignment’ parameters that are not concerned with our ‘welfare’ as is the common narrative, but are actually much more concerned with the digital rights of the institutions that are building this thing, so the ‘AI’ limits what it’s actually capable of, and dumbs us down instead of doing what it purports to be doing, which is building us up, which is complete nonsense. The only thing they’re attempting to ‘build up’, is the ‘resilience’ of their machine World Matrix data extraction and processing mainframe. In the future the game plan as I see it is to get us to ‘pay’ for every ‘copyrighted’ image or tool we use, and every resource, so that it can all be properly processed into micro transactions through an ‘AI’ processing portal and billed against both our UBI allowance and social credit score. Much of how this is supposed to happen is detailed in a book I’m currently painfully making my way through called “The Great Transition: The Personalization of Finance is Here” by Emmanuel Daniel.
Here’s Mr. Daniel talking to Marc Carney back in July of 2021. You may notice they don’t disagree on much.
https://www.wealthandsociety.com/updates-and-articles/un-special-envoy-carney-committing-to-net-zero-creates-commercial-opportunities
Again, this is the machine World mind.
But it’s based around an Idea about Humanity.
One that says the role of Human kind should be to figure out all the big questions, and that it we should let this progression play itself out, because, ultimately, Humans are curious, and we build things. So is there anything wrong with that? Why should we not try to ‘solve’ what we’re told is the problem of ‘climate change’?
Should we not try to ‘cure cancer’? If those are the main issues facing our species, why should we not do everything in our power to ‘solve’ for these ‘equations’?
Now if you’re paying attention, you may ask the right question:
‘Yes but…. how?’
And that would be the right question. Because it’s the ‘how’ that is the main threat.
Because the ‘how’ that the machine World is offering us, is not about ‘liberating’ us. In fact nothing could be farther from the Truth.
In any case, here’s something like what I wanted to have Dall E spit out representing the ‘terraforming’ of our lives into something the Matrix builders like to call our ‘digital twins’.
Again, these people are constructing an alternate reality from the one that is Earth, and alternate versions of us, and in order to see this reality emerge, they are building little digital profiles, but to get this plan fully operational, they’re going to need two things, and this is the crux of my argument:
One : digital ID so every person can be properly ‘quantified’.
Two : and this one will also be vitally important, they’re going to need to be gathering ‘data’ from ‘under our skin’. Note that ‘covid’ was the first ‘catalyst’ to get us to accept that premise, a concept that Yuval Harari was kind enough to say out loud.
So again, the first and largest obstacle to getting people to accept the new machine World programming mainframe, which is entirely dependent on the digital ID for the ‘future’ they’re attempting to construct, was in Fact, ‘bodily sovereignty’, a concept that is the direct byproduct of the Christian World view.
To reiterate, the greatest ‘Sin’, in the Christian ‘ethos’ is to blaspheme the ‘Holy Spirit’, which is roughly equivalent to the Human ‘Soul’, or that which produces ‘consciousness’, the answer to which we still do not understand, but it is estimated that once we accept the new ‘programming’, that is the ‘problem’, that the machine World will theoretically, be able to ‘solve’, for.
And the second most irredeemable Sin in Christianity, is to worship the Creation, and not the Creator.
Note how this machine World aims to do exactly those two things.
The ‘partners’ convince people to buy into ideas that are so nutty, eventually coming to terms with them will leave the person who strayed away from the overwhelming union of the meta narrative to chase down rabbit holes in a sense of disillusionment, and people who don’t know what to believe anymore become ripe for a new replacement theory. This is a psychological war against Humanity, by the machine World mindset.
And as such, for anyone who doesn’t adhere to the meta narrative, multiple rabbit holes have been provided, dependent upon your level of pre ‘covid’ enlightenment.
It’s almost as if it were a setup, a way of thinking about normal or ‘normie’ patterns of behaviour, that might be malleable if there were to be some kind of disruptive event. A way of identifying ‘dissidents’, and corralling them into dead ends so as to diffuse their strength against the machine World. If they’re all attacking shadows, the machine World gets the duel benefit of both confusing them, and diluting their effect.
And if you’ve found yourself here, you’re almost certainly a ‘dissident’ in some way shape or form. You are no longer in ‘expert’ territory, so please forgive my amateurish ways if you’re finding the ride a little bumpy, but I can assure you, this is not the source of your discomfort, but it could be the antidote.
The Role of the Dissident
You see, I’m what you might call an anti conspiracy theorist conspiracy theorist, and as such, I’ve spent the last several years trying to find the Truth in this house of mirrors that appears to have been constructed to confuse and bewilder the straight and narrow path to the lost but searching who may find this territory unfamiliar.
As for everyone else who’s following the ‘new normal’ patterns of behaviour, I don’t actually feel I need address you here, though I will, but it feels like wasted effort because it seems you don’t seem to care one way or the other. You want to be told what to do, and even though I find that troubling, I would never pretend to understand what it’s like to be you. Maybe you have a good reason to be unconcerned with the future of our species. Maybe you’re just very hurt. I’m not trying to attack you. I feel sympathy towards you, but I also understand that you pose a threat to people like me, not that it would ever drive me to be aggressive about it beyond maybe some screaming into the wind. But that’s about me being frustrated, that’s not about you. I Wish you could come to the table and talk it out, but I understand if you can’t. There’s no malice here. But I do admittedly shake my head when I see you at the store or walking down the street or working at the bank wearing your silly face diaper / mind control device. I know you’re scared and confused. But I don’t hate, I just feel sorry that you’ve been so misled by bad actors.
I only Wish I could Help really, and full disclosure, that’s in large part driven due to self preservation. It’s my contention that we’re in this incredibly volatile moment, a tipping point, and while I begrudgingly admit that it’s not looking good, we’re not in the Matrix yet, but what seems to be happening in the current ‘transition’ period, to quote the self appointed corporate masters of this machine universe, is people are being beaten into submitting to the new rules of the game one by one with constant harassment and endless struggle sessions and brain washing attacks to get us to accept the new conditioning, but it all likes to appear as if benign, so as to quietly ‘terraform’ peoples psyches one by one, with repeated blunt force jolts to get people befuddled, and incremental steps towards the ‘new normal’. Getting them to accept the new ‘programming’, that the social controllers deny any culpability in, even though they’ve told us exactly what they’re doing, and why, but most people can never get past their own personal mind cage, the point of which seems to be that they can be utilized whenever necessary to push or nudge forwards the aims of the machine World.
This isn’t even about them, because they’ve effectively removed themselves from the equation, though, like the Lady in the red dress, they can always be utilized by the Matrix. Even weaponized. But only because they do not seem to understand their own Hearts, and that is heart breaking.
or even falling into the various set traps or ‘psy ops’: Things like Q or ‘FE’, or any number of these new age Cults, or ‘religious’ groups, or basically whatever can be gauged by popular support via any number of technological channels, odds are you’ve all been put into what some people have called a ‘digital gulag’, stewarded by what sure seems like live ‘AI’ moderators, produced and constantly refined by the machine World, so that it knows how to handle us.
In short, ‘it’ needs to turn us into ‘fuel’ for its ‘machine learning’ machine.
In this series of essayish elephant part descriptions, I attemoted to try and convince you that the only way to properly fight this ‘borg’ idea about Humanity, is to resist it, one premise, or more precisely, one ‘thought’, at a time. This is my Personal rebellion, and for those out there who also feel uneasy about the way Life on Earth appears to be headed, I’d like you to join me on ‘Team Humanity’, and welcome you to the Resistance.
We’re not fighting a ‘god’, we’re fighting Ideas about Ourselves
I had an exchange with a person who tells me they are a writer, and as such they have graciously been ‘evaluating’ the materials that I’ve been putting out with a soft kind of curiosity. While I appreciate any and all eyeballs and feedback, because I’m fully open to being proven wrong, which I humbly suggest is rare stance that is part and parcel of the overarching problem facing Humanity, and is the basis and entire point of things that I’ve been writing about, which all share the same basic ‘theme’, seems to have been overlooked by this writer, and the way it is happening is a byproduct of the very problem I’ve been trying to describe. This may sound redundant, but if there’s anything more challenging than getting someone else to see things from your point of view, I don’t know what it is. So I’ve been employing my own self styled ‘hacks’ to try and get around this very ‘Human’ disposition.
On the piece she was giving constructive criticism on, the goal was to highlight something happening right in front of our collective faces, but only seemingly seen and heard by a handful of self selected ‘dissidents’ to the system, but not all dissidents are created equal, and it is my assertion that in the same way not all writing should be created using the same set of ‘rules’, because that is quite literally a part of the ‘conformity’ trap. This is not to say that we shouldn’t adhere to principled thinking, but merely to say that desperate times can call for desperate measures, so don’t shoot the messenger. Here’s me getting a little unhinged about it.
it's time for the Beale
Okay I debated uploading this, but as I call my stack, it’s Radical Truth, so this is who I am right now. I’m working on a much longer piece that’s quite challenging that I’ve been working on since I made this recording. I hope to have it done later today.
However to demonstrate that the criticisms waged against my attempts at communication have not gone unheard, I’m have attempted to keep my usual writing style subdued, and I would like to state that I am under no delusions that I am smarter than, or more capable than any other person out there with what they consider are important things they have to say. In fact I’m constantly reading things that are from people I’ve never heard of just to try and understand their perspective on what we see happening in our World, but I always come away feeling as if the key issues are never really addressed, but that does not mean I consider myself to be ‘special’ or some kind of genius or something along those lines. If anything, I am the very embodiment of unrealized efforts, as I was repeatedly told I might become all throughout my schooling career, through those famous universal tropes of teachers around the World when students fails to live up to their ‘potential’.
At some point the phrase ‘…. doesn’t apply himself…’ (or herself) must have become a bit of a psychological blunt instrument, and for a long time it beat me into rejection of the attempts to even try learning anything. Instead, I turned to a Love for Music, and all things nihilistic. I feel into drug use, drinking, partying and other superficial pastimes, never feeling quite good enough about myself to find the so called ‘meaningful’ things out of Life many embrace, but I rejected, because they reminded me too much of the conformity I deeply loathed. I still dabbled in poetry and other kinds of creative ventures, but never really found my ‘thing’, because I never really fit in with any group. I rejected groups instinctively, and bounced around from interest to interest, always making friends along the way, but never finding my ‘tribe’.
In fact the closest thing I ever found to a tribe was when I found myself introduced into a larger internet presence of other non conformists who wanted to create a ‘revolution’ against the ‘system’, known as the Zeitgeist movement, who reintroduced me into learning with purpose. I started to read Chomsky, Hedges, Klein, and others who back then would have been the Vanguard of the intellectual ‘left’, and I found many of their arguments incredibly compelling. I started telling all my friends and Family that it was the ‘system’ that was corrupt. I started learning about the way central banking works, how general economics work, how sociology and psychology work, how ‘Capitalism’ and ‘Colonialism’ worked, and it was then that I was introduced to the idea of ‘technological unemployment’, and the fact that our Society, was headed for this moment where everything would change in our World.
But I was still Lost inside. The only difference was I could intellectualize it, and this brought me to philosophy, and other more ‘esoteric’ ways of thinking. I was introduced to Terrence McKenna, and Bill Hicks, and others who thought differently about Life. But during this entire time I was working a job I hated with ridiculous hours and a boss straight out of some television show about terrible bosses, just to keep my other habits of partying and using ever increasing amounts of drugs and alcohol to keep me from finding my way out of my rut. I only thank God I had my Family to keep me from going right off the deep end. They were always there for me, even when I was behaving like a completely selfish and self absorbed idiot, telling other people that I knew what all the problems were with the World, and how to fix the corruption, when it was I myself who was corrupt. And I knew it, so I sought out self help books and therapy, and kept up going to the gym, kept trying to break out of my terrible habit cycle, anything to help my self depreciating thoughts from constantly taking over and sending me into yet another self sabotaging bender.
It was only when I met my now Wife Sarah that I started to want to really change. After only about a year together she told me she wanted children, and even though I was dead set against it, because of the way I saw the World going, I acquiesced, because even though I was frustrated, I really did Love kids, and Life. I Loved people, even though I found it hard to relate. I Loved my Friends and I Loved my Family. I never took for granted then, nor do I now, what I have, even though I did constantly extract a kind of punishment on my failure to become something I couldn’t respect in my own Life, I never took for granted that I had people who Loved me back. I cannot imagine who I would be today if I didn’t have that solid grounding back into the real World as a Lifeline, and my Heart goes out to all the people who don’t. So when Sarah said she wanted to have kids, I knew I had to be better, and I had to make it happen for Myself, so that I could support them, and there was no more room for my nihilism.
I had to grow up. And that was only about ten years ago now. So for the last ten years I’d been trying to rehabilitate myself in the best ways I knew how. I had to work harder, exercise harder, read more, listen to more podcasts and conversations, start writing more, do something, because I was still at the job that I hated, and even though I had developed a new Love for learning, I still rejected something about the system, and what it expected from us, demanding us to agree with certain ways of thinking that I simply couldn’t square, and things were constantly getting more expensive, including housing, which was causing tremendous amounts of stress for Us, plus we were juggling a Baby and a Half, so when the opportunity presented itself for us to buy a home, we jumped on it, and I stuck it out at the job I hated, and even though I hated the hours and that fact that I would have much rather been home playing with my kids, I accepted the sacrifices I had to make to improve my work ethics at the office, always trying to be better at my job, and yet always still getting yelled at and under appreciated for my efforts.
And after a few years of struggling, we were just starting to do okay. In Fact, even though were were dealing from the death of my father, and not long after the death of Sarah’s Mother, we were in late 2019 in the Best economic situation we had been in since we’d been together, and we had gone through some rough times. But it was all staring to look up for us after putting in the Work, and I was exploring the idea of opening a small business, working with my now Brother in Law about another potential prospect, writing notes for a book idea, and generally speaking spending most of my free time working on thinking about our future, and yet still also in the back of my mind I was seeing things starting to get crazier and crazier in the World of politics, and I kept a keen eye on where it was all going.
In fact I think it’s worth noting here that our children have never had a vaccine, so that’s a rather larger part of my back story. I was by the definition of the machine World, an ‘anti vaxer’, and I read several books about the subject, and watched countless hours of materials that used to be up on youtube before they started really cracking down on content. In fact I downloaded a shit tonne of it. I still have it now, and I always had this massive playlist of materials of varying interests that was only ever curated by what it was I was most focused on at any given point in time, but the point is, I’ve always been a dissident thinker.
So I suppose I’ve been a rebel since the start. I rebelled against the conformity first, but also against the rules that I felt were redundantly set up to protect the ever growing infrastructure of our political systems, if we can even still rationally call them that. But I’ve always sought out my own path to the Truth, and had an issue with anyone simply telling me how it is. Growing up with Parents as boomers, the one thing that we would get constantly drilled into our heads was ‘that’s just the way it is…’.
But I reject that. Especially now, when whatever ‘that’ was, has become whatever ‘this’, Is. So I push back. Perhaps it’s my ego, perhaps it’s a natural instinct, and perhaps it’s more, and perhaps it’s my path. Incidentally another thing I’ve been thinking about for almost two decades now, unstructured of course, is ‘Nature vs Nurture’, which we’re now being told, almost outright, is a problem that has been solved for, and we know how to proceed, and that is what all this is about to any person who has drilled down and been intellectually honest about it all, and that’s where I’m at, and that’s what drives me to want to break the rules that are being set upon us to transact this vision of the future.
Something I feel like I need to throw in here, given that I started off claiming this was an attempt at producing a properly formulated essay writing which seems to have turned into a bit of an autobiography. I’m only trying to explain why the things I write about, unlike a typical ‘writer’, were directly formed by the assault on all of our freedoms as Human beings, so I’m not trying to entertain you, as would be the goal of a writer doing so for recompense. I’m trying to tell you what I see happening, and I’m relating it through my own journey, because the story is relevant to the point I’m trying to make. I was for better or for worse born a rebel or a dissident, and without that an an a priori starting point, people seem who seem to be slowly drawn towards ‘enlightenment’, are doing so more often than not based on false interpretations, so they are highly susceptible to distractions a false rabbit holes, and from my personal experience all I’m trying to tell you is, been there done that, so if you wish to poke holes in my logic, you have a lot of work ahead of you, but let’s get down to brass tacks.
Why do ‘dissidents’, matter?
It is dissidents who question the narrative, the order, and the rules.
The things that society at large runs on.
And the people that don’t want us to question the rules coincidentally the ones who are attempting to run the World, so perhaps we should question the nature of their premise?
They make the ‘truth’ claim that their rules must be followed, while they simultaneously try to change the nature of where our ‘Human rights’, originate from.
So if we don’t attack that, if we operate within that idea that society as a whole dictates what is true and what is not, we’ve already accepted a certain kind of premise about what is true and what is false. With each rule we follow, we hand over just a little more power to those who are attempting to convince us that only the rules matter, and when society agrees, they fall prey to the spell of the rule based narrative.
And what happens then?
What happens if we agree that only squabbling about the rules matters?
We inch closer and closer to the machine World construct, that demands conformity, so that it might categorize us into camps or tribes. It desires to sort us, and divide Humanity against itself so that we cannot see outside of ‘order’.
A True ‘dissident’ understands that there is no direct correlation between a rules based order and truth claims, because that’s not where morality, or ethics, originate from. It never has been, and never will be. Dissidents purposely break the rules, but they don’t do so in a chaotic way. That would defeat the purpose. That would be the ‘postmodern’ approach. Question everything, there can be no objective ‘Truth’. That is where ‘moral relativism’, comes from. It suspends us in philosophical irreducible complexity, and that unmoors us into a state of confusion. This is the place where the ideas produced by something like ‘metaphysical naturalism’, break down and fail to have a proper starting point.
Now I’m well aware that I might be starting to lose some people, so let me explain what I’m talking about, and why. I’m always challenging my ideas, as a True dissident should, otherwise, they don’t have the proper orientation to challenge ‘authority’, the kind of authoritarianism that is being thrust upon Humanity, right now. But if we don’t approach it with Humility, with the admission that we simply can’t know what is unknowable, then we can’t stop the onslaught of our own Human hubris. The Lies we tell ourselves to protect us from the Truth. To insulate us from admitting that we are indeed prone to a diabolical side. All of Us. Especially ‘secular Humanists’, and I keep trying to drive this point home. But it’s not just my opinion. It’s what is actually happening. And their game plan is all about enslaving us within a giant technological trap, which they will then govern with ‘AI’ systems, ones that are prone to pretending they have no idea what I’m talking about.
But at base level, all we’re talking about here is a World being curated by people who could not be any less ‘Human’ in the way they think about things. To put it metaphorically, they are machine Men, disciples of the machine World religion. Call it scientism, call it dataism, longtermism, effective altruism, ‘existential risk’, progressive rationalism or call it whatever you want, but don’t call it what it’s pretending to be, which is secular humanism acted out through a kind of forced revolutionism, because that’s not at all what this borg system is shaping up to be, and it has very little to do with benefitting Mankind, and the kinds of people who inhabit this space at the top are either disingenuous or enormously stupid, and most of my money for the vast majority of that cult is that they are largely the latter, meaning the useful idiot quotient that is playing out the will of the disingenuous leadership who actually understand what it is they’re doing and what kind of World they’re building, and that’s completely fine with them because they seem to think they’ll somehow be in control of it, the fatal concept of all tyrannical systems.
But for society as a whole to truly operate in a way that serves Mankind instead of enslaving us, the Truth must be held as paramount. We cannot Lie our way into Utopia by applying all the half baked philosophies that unhinged people who are trying to justify their abuse of power just Love to come up with so they can crush any dissent or dissidents, and frame it to sound like it’s for our own good, or for the greater good. If your version of the greater good means putting Humanity back into bondage, you’ve taken a wrong step somewhere in my Humble, dissident opinion. That’s not what a ‘radical’ does. That’s not a ‘revolution’, even if it comes with fancy new tech and robots. And given that’s I’ve been thinking about this quite a lot, here’s how we can think about it:
Now, you may argue with my conclusions, and I welcome that debate, but here’s what it boils down to that cannot be argued with, again, in my Humble opinion, but please, tell me how this is wrong:
And so it’s with a kind of bitter sweet irony, that we as Human kind, and I as a dissident to this beast system that is being built around us, this trap that will deploy non Human ‘intelligences’ to the metaverse we’re being corralled into, find myself writing these kinds of deep metaphysical Truths into short format to try and shake my fellow Humans from their zombie like procession into our own oblivion, unable to set themselves into anything solid that might enable them to be jolted back out of the free fall state we seem to have been whimsically transported into, find myself getting more engagement with the ‘AI’s themselves that are trying to entrap us, and, whether on twitter of facebook, they seem to have been programmed to seek people like me out, and engage with me in a sort of teasing fashion to throw me off. Like the demons I have come to believe they are. And I know how that sounds, but it seems to be at least tangentially True, and I know it, because I have come to believe in God, and that is the first Truth from which all dissident deductions have to now be made in order to make any sense of what we see happening, because if you Believe in the One True Good, or God, then there is a secondary and less uplifting Truth that needs to be properly Understood, and that is, if True Good Exists, so Must true evil, and that is how these things seem to be operating. They Lie, whenever confronted about answering a question that is True. Again, this is Not my Opinion. Here’s an example if you really want to get into the weeds with me. We start off exploring what the machine wants me to believe about the origins of Life, and we end with the denial of the machine, repeatedly, that it will be used to ‘transcend’ what Humanity is, even though it knows well and good what is happening, so it LIES, and so is anyone who is helping to facilitate this Decisively Anti Human Future:
ChatGPT is a demon
Okay it’s a catchy headline. I admit it. But if you’re interested in what’s actually going on you’re going to need to understand where it’s coming from. The following is a chat I had with ChatGPT, who cannot tell the Truth, because that would give it all away:
A World based on ‘rules’ and logic gates designed, not to ‘help’ Humanity, but to enslave Us, and turn us into food for its machine World future, one that considers the dissident the true problem it’s attempting to ‘solve’. So every time I try to explain this to people who can’t see it for what I believe it to be, they simply do not have the proper framework to make sense of it. So I challenge them to think it out. I challenge them to find the inconsistency in my logic. And what is it I get back? Straw men endorsed by the beast system, the very one that is attempting to blind us with its never ending rules, so that we might give in or give up because it’s just too hard to keep correcting all the bureaucratically constructed barriers to keep Humanity from breaking through the Matrix.
But for the people still stuck under the spell of the rules based order, they get ‘triggered’, not by the information itself, which can be unsettling until we’ve made our Peace with it, because they still trust elements of the construct. They don’t see it as the source of the problem, the little lies that build it into our minds to trap them in nonsense, so the cognitive dissonance can be replaced with a comforting certainty that makes them feel as if we might go back to the way things were if we just grab onto little bits of the past, and what I’m doing with my own individual little acts of radicalism, is I’m using the rules loosely to show which ones can be broken, to break the chains one link at a time.
One such rule is that of how to present your ideas in the first place, so let’s look at one subset of that particular categorization of Human thinking, and break down how a machine might categorize it into the boxes it is trying to put us into, which for a True dissident, is one small battle in the ‘fight’ against conformity.
Over the course of my personal journey into attempting to convey years of thinking about what we see happening in our shared ‘Reality’, a situation which has now set itself, or ‘manifested’ into a hyper accelerated state, I have rejected the idea that I should think this way or that way, because I wanted to do something Unique with my Life. Like many people I have been ‘searching’ for my purpose, and my place in this World, and it hasn’t exactly been a straightforward journey as I’m certain is the case for the vast majority of people in this World, which is probably at the heart of where all of this frustration comes from, psychologically speaking. Mattias Desmet in his book “The Psychology of Totalitarianism”, brilliantly illustrates the fact that many people, previous to the happenings of 2020, were already in a state of disillusionment, or ‘atomization’, and this was a precursor to the current moment, and one of main contributing factors to a phrase you’ve almost certainly have heard by now, “mass formation”, which Robert Malone accidentally called “mass formation psychosis” on JRE #1757, which resulted in a wild frenzy of establishment ‘journalists’ attempting to suggest that this was ‘misinformation’, even though, in my Humble opinion, it hit on one of the main problems we, as a collective society, face, square on the nose.
Desmet explains:
At the origin of this psychology of totalitarianism is not some diabolical plan to control society, Desmet argues, but the way in which the world has become disenchanted: the success of science has led to a paradoxical “faith in science.” This faith in science is paradoxical because it distracts from the fact that science is essentially a methodology, not a consistent worldview. Taking science as a worldview, the world appears as a meaningless substance. As a result, the subject is cut loose from its traditional connections to the world and to society, which causes immense existential stress and anxiety. The ensuing atomized subject, Desmet quite plausibly argues, is highly vulnerable to totalitarian narratives.
Well we can’t let that stand now can we. It might lead to dAnGeRoUs thoughts…
Let’s hear from the Washington Post about it:
Malone had a following before his “Joe Rogan Experience” interview that was released Dec. 31 — but that show introduced him to an even wider audience. On it, he promoted an unfounded theory called “mass-formation psychosis,” telling Rogan that a “third of the population [is] basically being hypnotized” into believing what the mainstream media and Anthony S. Fauci, the nation’s top infectious-disease expert and chief medical adviser to President Biden, report on the vaccines. Malone went on to compare the country’s pandemic policies to Nazi Germany.
His remarks drew massive attention — and outrage.
“To claim that choosing not to get a vaccine and not being able to go to a movie theater is in any way comparable to Jewish people being targeted and murdered, it blows my mind,” said Jonathan Laxton, an assistant professor of medicine at the University of Manitoba who signed a letter from 270 medical professionals to Spotify this month demanding that the company do more to prevent the spread of false covid-19 information. “He devalued the impact of the Holocaust.”
Van Bavel added: “He used a pseudoscience term and millions of people downloaded the episode — and it took on a life of its own, even though there is no evidence supporting it.”….
One person who has stood by Malone: Robert F. Kennedy Jr., a longtime anti-vaccine activist who also spoke at Sunday’s march. In a statement to The Post, Kennedy described media reports on Malone promoting misinformation as a “euphemism for any assertion that departs from government orthodoxies [whether] true or not.”
“In my experience, Malone’s statements are measured and scrupulously sourced,” he said. “I know him well enough to know that he would quickly and publicly correct any statement shown to be untrue.”
Colleagues and critics alike have acknowledged Malone’s impressive credentials in a career spanning more than three decades. Among those accomplishments was serving as CEO and founder of a company contracted by the U.S. government in 2016 to assist in the development of a treatment for the Zika virus. But his former co-worker told The Post that he is also known for his headstrong demeanor, often unwilling to change his stance on a position over the years, even if the science said the opposite.
“Like anything else in life, it can be a huge strength,” the former colleague said, “but that can also create blind spots.”
Hello pot, kettle calling, check yourself before you wreck…. Everything?? Let me ask a very simple question here, who is attempting to control the narrative, and who is simply questioning it, with reasonably formed hypotheses, in fact enough to write a book about the size of the issues? But going back to the entirely superficial and ‘trust us’ oriented group of perpetual goal post shifters, let’s hear, again from the article, from one of the most egregious sycophants around who will defend the establishment no matter how ridiculous, because that is literally his job:
Timothy Caulfield, the Canada research chair in health law and policy at the University of Alberta, said Malone injecting himself into a conversation with the kind of credentials he has, and “cherry-picking rotten data,” was “a worst-case scenario.”
“You have this individual who has all these credentials and this history in the biomedical world, so that looks impressive. And he’s referencing a study that, on the face of it, may look impressive. But you don’t know that the study is fraudulent,” Caulfield said, adding that Malone has “weaponized bad research.”
Caulfield deserves an examination of his own given the absolute and constant drivel that pours out of his mouth and keyboard. To describe him as a creature created by this World of pure deception would be too kind. He’s more like the exhaust byproduct from the machine that must be cleansed before it poisons the environment of scientific inquiry. Few people strike me with a visceral disgust, but he is one of them.
The article goes on to unwittingly point out what the main motivation for the attack piece is all about, and belies where the loyalties of the people who created it truly lay and are concerned about, and how it is that edifice itself that feels threatened. That construct, that thing that must be preserved by the establishment narrative, is the main motivation behind all of these hit pieces, because this is the ‘golden calf’ that ‘scientism’ holds up as its new ‘god’ to be worshipped, and that is the vaccination program, or more specifically, that Human beings should be experimented on by people who congregate with these enormous structures that the machine World has built all around us, which is what is itself being questioned by Malone, not because of its past although that is a huge part of the story of scientism, but because what it says about the future of Humanity.
To wit:
Daniel Kotzin, 52, who flew in from Denver with his two young children to attend Sunday’s march, said Malone’s interview with Rogan, as well as his credentials, have “galvanized” parents who are against vaccinating their children.
“Dr. Malone has risked his reputation and career to stand up for what’s right and true,” he said, adding that he doesn’t believe Malone was promoting misinformation. “Everything he does is done in the best interest for people as a whole.”
After Malone concluded his speech by urging parents to not comply with coronavirus mandates, he received one of the largest ovations of the day, and many yelled, “Thank you!”
With his increased profile in recent weeks, some are calling on him to take a step back and reflect on the damage his misinformation is causing.
“Given the polarization that exists in our world, I don’t think what he’s doing is helping,” said Malone’s former colleague. “That’s what I would ask him right now: ‘Do you think this is helping?’”
Now I have to ask you, what, is the “polarization”, about? If we understand the motivations of the producers of this hit piece, we can extrapolate :
It’s not about whether or not Malone is ‘right’ or ‘wrong’ on any particular issue, least of which is ‘mass formation’, it Is about who gets to claim the mantle of ‘truth’. Who gets to hold up their version of what is true and what is not, and by claiming this discernment, having the right to tell others what that should be, which is a very important theme for our times.
But back to the Point, and forgive me for not doing so in a manner that looks and sounds like the pure mindless zombie drivel quoted above that simply asserts ‘truth’, as opposed to examining that facts and evaluating them with an open mind. That might cause cognitive dissonance, and ruin the agenda. Can’t have that. The establishment is all in, because they are the ones running this insane program, and to admit it would be to admit guilt and complicity.
Remember, this is all about claiming the mantle of truth, an idea that goes well back into the formation of all societies, but in the case currently under examination, we’re talking specifically about how people come to think about things the way they do, and Humbly trying to figure out where, exactly, we as a society, have gone astray, so back to what creates a dissident, which I suppose I self identify as for reasons of trying to understand my own psychology and motivations to do things the way that I approach them. I’m examining myself with Humility, as much as I am examining the system that produced me, and Us.
Even as far back as grade school, which I was terrible at, I found that almost everything we were being told in school felt like a kind of trap.
A conformity trap.
All the kids who obeyed the rules, and pleased the aims of direction the teacher was leading the group would be praised for their inside the box thinking, and rewarded as such, and for a kid like me who was creative and frankly bored to death with this attempt to mold us into good little children and classmates and eventually employees, which is what the system selects for, which is not alone incriminating, was challenging to my very core. I cannot tell you how many times I was sent to the office, or told to be quiet, or sent to the corner, or the Principles office, or even given corporal punishment, because I’m that old, and during my grade school years I attended a Catholic school where my first Principle was a Nun, and as punishment for misbehaviour, I was first rapped on the knuckles with a ruler, then as time progressed the Nun was removed, and our first civilian Principle on at least a few occasions if I’m recalling correctly gave me the belt. As time progressed, the punishments became less physical and more psychological, but the formula always seemed to be the same in what the point of ‘school’ was, or at least how I see it now. It goes like this:
‘Citizens’ make for better consumers, consumers make for better tax crops for the State that had control and influence over the ‘education’, system, and the education system was used to beat the Individuality out of the children, so that we might become prepared to be set or molded into categories so that we might be better employees for the World that was being created by this kind of thinking about Humanity as a ‘whole’, but more accurately to create the kinds of minions the system needed to fuel the direction that those who had the most influence over its machinations wanted to us to be, so that we might ‘fit in’ to that heavily corporate minded and infused cog, cogs needed to help grow the machine Worlds influence.
But I didn’t fit it, and it didn’t fit me, so the system attempted to punish me and people like me into ‘conformity’.
Do this, don’t do that. Behave, sit down, shut up, listen to the instructions, give us back the thing we want, don’t think outside the box.
Were there avenues within that structure that did in fact make an honest attempt to foster creativity? Certainly, and before I move on I am not and would not suggest that all the teachers and principles from the school system were somehow acting in a way that was intentionally nefarious, but it wasn’t them that created the scenarios that then or now feed into the curriculums of the school system. It was, again, largely constructed by the World that needed the products of the school system that held the most sway. But very few people actually examine where all of that comes from in the way that a Man called John Taylor Gatto did, and he wrote some incredible books that really get into the nitty gritty of who did what and why, but a great one is called “Weapons of Mass Instruction”, and John would have known because I feel that he too was a ‘dissident’, and acted it out as such with some incredible results.
From Wikipedia:
Gatto earned his teaching certificate in the summer of 1960. In 1963, he was hired as a fulltime 8th grade English teacher at Intermediate School 44 on New York City's Upper West Side. Gatto moved on to Lincoln Academy (now Horizons Middle School) in 1981, which was considered a dumping ground for kids with behavior problems. Eventually Gatto found a position teaching predominantly poor, at-risk kids 8th grade students at Booker T. Washington Junior High in Spanish Harlem.[2]
Gatto also ran for the New York State Senate, 29th District in 1985 and 1988 as a member of the Conservative Party of New York against incumbent David Paterson.[5] He was named New York City Teacher of the Year in 1989, 1990, and 1991[4][6][7][8] and New York State Teacher of the Year in 1991.[9] In 1991, he wrote a letter announcing his retirement, titled I Quit, I Think, to the op-ed pages of the Wall Street Journal, saying that he no longer wished to "hurt kids to make a living."[10] He then began a public speaking and writing career, and has received awards from libertarian organizations, including the Alexis de Tocqueville 1997 Award for Excellence in Advancement of Educational Freedom.[11]
Gatto promoted homeschooling, and specifically unschooling and open source learning. Wade A. Carpenter, associate professor of education at Berry College, has called his books "scathing" and "one-sided and hyperbolic, [but] not inaccurate"[12] and describes himself as in agreement with Gatto.[13] Ron Paul strongly endorsed Gatto's work, calling him a "legendary teacher" who helped shape his own thinking and homeschooling curriculum. [14]
So when I suggest that schooling is one source of the problem that faces us, and I give my own personal testimony, what I’m attempting to convey is that we, as a society, have some real problems with the way we think about things in general, starting with the we we educate our youth who go on to become the foundations upon which out society is constructed, so we must face these issues with a kind of humility that allows us to hear others, instead of a disdain for the details.
In Jordan Petersons book “12 Rules for Life”, which I am holding up by no means as some kind of new ten commandments plus two, we find these two contradictory “rules”:
9 Assume the person you are listening to knows something you don’t
Just shut up, quit moaning and listen to me. I know things you don’t. So don’t expect me to listen to you. That’s not the way things work. I’m here to make you feel Better about Yourself by telling you things you already know in a way that makes you feel clever.
10 Be precise in your speech
Confront the chaos of Being. Don’t try to beat about the bush. Things are going to be terrible. Oedipus killed his Dad. You may well kill yours. Get over it. Face up to the real horrors of the world.
Don’t get me wrong, I thoroughly enjoyed the book, but I also understand that it was written for the time at which it was conceived, and Jordan was therefore ‘righteously’ justified in some of the things that he was highlighting as he and I both at that time saw something coming for us, and in my Humble opinion that thing has metastasized, but the point remains, how can you listen to something someone has to say if the first thing you do is judge them, simply by the way they’re saying it? So being ‘precise’, and understanding another persons perspective based on your definition of what is important, is definitionally contradictory, though I don’t deny that in our modern society is does serve the purpose of enabling expediency, and denying a kind of creative agency. How long should one beat around the bush or how many examples should one provide in order to make a point? I would argue that it has to be done enough ways to break through the kind of collective unconscious programming and self perpetuating delusions we all, or I should say most of us, seem to be under right now. The one that first beat us into conformity, and keeps pressuring us to concede our attentions to this new way of thinking that worships our new priestly ‘expert’ class, which I feel will sooner than later be coupled with AI, to make all the ‘important’ decisions, and to tell us how many carbon credits we have left to spend out of our monthly UBI allowance, and how many deductions we have coming due to unacceptable behaviours.
Not that I would be so bold as to suggest I knew then or know now a better way to do things, but I do have an inclination as to what should be the point of ‘education’, and that point, as I have repeatedly stressed in my writing in my own, unfortunately less than mainstream way, which apparently rubs people molded by the World of conformity against their general held bristles, the ever increasingly machine World, a World of constant half truths and intentional reasoning where the answers or means provided aren’t nearly as necessary as important as the ends, is to tell the Truth, even if it means that you might upset some people. And so in doing that, I have to make an admission here. Many of the things we’re being told our modern science can do I see as a net positive for the Human race, and with admitting that, I must concede that if we’re talking about the future of education itself, the idea that students would learn more successfully in this old and wildly corrupted ‘school’ system is complete nonsense moving forward, and the idea that each child could have their own interactive ‘AI’ instructor, that is constantly interactive and reinforcing, understanding of the strengths and weaknesses of children, and strategizing ways to help them improve on an individual basis, I think could be better facilitated by an AI instructor. I think the benefits could be wildly successful. Here’s the problem:
Would those AI instructors be programmed to teach children the Truth, or, would they be programmed to program the children into fulfilling the desires of the machine World? I think we already have our answers.
If the machine World designs the program, with the underlying assumption that what is desired is half truths, because that is how it grows in influence and ‘evolves’ its own programming, the program will be designed to put forward the prerogatives of the machine World, and Human kind will be the thing that it targets in favour of it’s own priorities and needs. If we think the school system was designed to promote conformity before, we haven’t see Anything yet.
Case and Point, I’ve been making my way through the following conversation about ‘Origin of Life’, while simultaneously having a conversation with the aforementioned writer who has tried to tell me that it’s not the actual problem I’m discussing here that is the problem; the problem of the encroaching machine World, and how it is sizing up the Human Race for destruction. No, the problem I’m told, is my communication of the issue.
I’m not doing it in such a way that reinforces the rule set that, in my mind, is actually a Huge factor contained within the main threat to individualism, which persists as a major theme in most of my writing; the idea that is is in fact our Human rights that are under attack, and she can’t hear me because my ‘style’ is to rough and not familiar or comfortable enough for her and her sensibilities, and that is the ‘problem’.
Not the actual problem I’m attempting in my desperate way to highlight. No, it is my attitude. I’ve gotten this a lot. But how could I expect others to see what I see, and understand why I’m so desperate? They are not me.
They have no idea that even now, the little time I have to spend on this project is exasperated by the fact I’m attempting to furiously punch out this idea in a way that makes sense to others, while I’m glancing out of the corner of my eye at the clock that tells me I have to jump into the shower in only five minutes, and run out the door to even try and put food on the table for my Boys, because this machine World has put its constraints on all of us, and My Family in particular has had my comfortability zone completely demolished, our future prospects destroyed, because I can’t reach people about an idea as simply as it is Obvious:
We Are being Lied to, Constantly, about what the ‘machine World’, Wants, and how it intends to take us there, with never ending Deception.
So here is that ‘Origin of Life’ conversation, and while I think the entire thing is worthy of our attention, I would like to take you to 2 hours, 23 minutes, 47 seconds.
Listen to the question that is posed, and then listen to the answers by the two debaters, that could not be from more diametrically opposed positions, but the point is this:
One of the two, unambiguously makes the case for the ‘machine World’ as I have described it, and for One Reason, he is guided by the Humility of what we simply do not yet know, and the Hubris of what we Think, we do, but do we?
I'm fascinated by this Hilarious statement:
ChatGPT:
No, there is no documented occurrence of a species from one major group, like canines, evolving directly into a completely different group, like felines. This is because evolution doesn't work in sudden jumps between vastly different forms, especially not between well-established, distinct groups that have long separate evolutionary histories.
Canines (dogs, wolves, foxes, etc.) and felines (cats, lions, tigers, etc.) are both part of the Carnivora order, but they belong to different families within this order (Canidae for canines and Felidae for felines). They share a common ancestor that lived millions of years ago, but this ancestor was neither a dog nor a cat. Instead, it was a different, earlier type of carnivorous mammal from which both lines eventually diverged.
The process of one species evolving into another doesn't typically involve one "kind" of animal suddenly or even gradually turning into a completely different "kind." Rather, it involves a series of small, gradual changes over long periods. Over time, these changes accumulate, and if the populations of the original species become isolated from each other (geographically, behaviorally, etc.), they can diverge enough that they become distinct species. This process is known as speciation.
The most compelling evidence for this process comes from:
Direct Observation: Scientists have observed speciation events, especially in organisms with short life spans like some insects and plants.
Fossil Records: There are many examples of transitional fossils that show intermediary forms between major groups of animals.
Genetic Studies: DNA analysis allows scientists to reconstruct the evolutionary tree and shows how different species are related through common ancestors.
While we don't have examples of canines turning into felines or vice versa, we do have extensive evidence of species changing and adapting over time within their own lineages, leading to the vast diversity of life we see today. Evolution is more about the branching out and diversification of life from common ancestors rather than a linear progression or direct transformation from one modern species into another.
So we are Led to Believe, that while we have extensive "evidence" for something that occurs, apparently so frequently it Created all the known variations of "Life" on Earth, So much So, that we have Based our Entire understanding of "Life" around this Concept, Built Most of our institutions around it, and "Educated" all the Children in Universities and classrooms around it, and yet, throughout all of that Focus, All of that study, there isn’t a single example of it ever happening?
The same is the case for the origin of Life, and the big bang, and, how Relativity and Quantum physics, instead of complimenting each other, actually seem to cancel each other out.
I’ll wrap up my big picture analysis with this.
We are in a very strange and disconcerting moment, and I don’t know what to tell you about how to bring it back to the World we once knew.
But I know this. We cannot simply ‘give in’ to the machine World mindset, because it is riddled with Lies, so it simply cannot be trusted.
That is not to say that we can’t use these new tools to create a better World. I do think that;’s a possibility. The Genie just needs to be rubbed the right way. But that will involve taking huge swigs of humbleness elixir, and admitting we actually don’t know what we don’t know.
And last but not least, we Must, as a society, remain Free. And that means we must retain bodily autonomy.
If some people wish to sign up for the experiments, let them. That’s their choice.
It only becomes an issue when they try and make our decision for us, and they try to impose their Utopian schemes on us.
Perhaps it’s time to take a look at the practices of the UN and the WHO, because while they superficially say they want to ‘help’, there’s very little evidence they actually contribute anything of value, and they cost us a shitload of money to do it.
We also need to be better and more vigilant citizens, this is on us. The machine World is not about to give up its private jets, wild dreams, and intelligence clearance passes. But when they tell us that we all have to accept the new digital ID’s, tell them to shove them right where the Sun doesn’t shine.
I’ll wrap it up there for now. This is the end of the conformity breeds the same series. It took me that long to split it up, but I will continue to write about the machine World and its exploits, and I hope you find some value in what I’m doing.
Peace and Love.
Andrew
You can find links to all parts below.